The road to 2019 continues to get a lot greener -- and we aren't talking about the worthless Federal Reserve Notes. Tuesday, Governor Chris Christie officially made New Jersey the 16th state to allow medicinal marijuana dispensaries to be opened, after a two-year delay by the governor to ensure the users and sellers of the drug wouldn't face federal persecution.
Are the days of smoking pot in fear of arrest coming to an end? After a report by the Global Commission on Drug Policy stated that the international War on Drugs has failed, Representatives Barney Frank (D-MA) and Ron Paul (R-TX) have sponsored a bill that would end the federal prohibition on marijuana, and leave the decision of legalization to the states.
As we move into another election cycle, there are some major moves coming down the pipeline around marijuana legalization. Two states, California and Colorado, will push for full legalization this year with a ballot iniative, and Washington or Oregon may as well.
One point that all of these states have in common that activists will have to overcome the already-passed Medical Marijuana laws in each of these states. One might think that simply because these laws are passed and marijuana is widely available, taking the next step should be easy. However, this state of affairs can actually hinder the legislative process for a number of reasons.
First and foremost (at least to the liberty-minded) is something that I covered in my piece on why Prop. 19 died in California: embedded interests who enjoy government protection from competition.
I'm willing to bet that a majority -- if not most -- of these incarcerations relate to nonviolent "drug offenses" (i.e. non-crimes). If you aren't a pugnacious opponent of the breathtakingly racist War on Drugs -- no matter how politically correct you might consider yourself -- you are implicitly facilitating the most racist domestic policy of our time.
A new book from an Ohio State law professor reports that there are now more black American men in prison, jail, on probation, or on parole than were enslaved in 1850. This is largely due, the author has found, to the impact of the War on Drugs, which is "'waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color,' she said, even though studies have shown that whites use and sell illegal drugs at rates equal to or above blacks." Here's an interview with the author:
Today Facebook’s algorithm elicited mucho facepalms from yours truly. My Facebook account thought I would be interested in the above ad and placed it on my page when I awoke on my birthday morning. Why in the world would someone whose profile is so obviously libertarian be interested in an ad campaign centered around a government career of stealing drugs and unproductively caging people for providing a valid entrepreneurial service?
Tom DiLorenzo's ultra-PC university (but I repeat myself) is considering disciplining him for ties to a "hate group." Must leftish organizations always comport themselves like zombies?
Incidentally, if the hate-sniffers of hyper-liberal academia and the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center truly cared about ending racism (rather than employing the term as an epithet against dissidents who deviate from the Oprahized, Dr. Phil-approved PC line), they would turn their crosshairs on real racism: I.E. the War on Drugs, The Wars overseas, and The Federal Reserve.
The more uplifting elements of the left's platform are hobbled by their attachment to the state; they love it more than they hate racism (or love peace).
Today an “Ask Obama” forum was held by YouTube, with questions submitted and voted on online. One question was about drug legalization, from a member of LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition). Obama says he "is not in favor of legalization" but he does think it is a "legitimate topic for debate." What a guy! How nice of him -- letting us debate and all.
Social Networks for YAL