Posts in "Universal Healthcare"

Kelse Moen's picture
By Kelse Moen at 6:21AM

Ouch!

Even I think this is awkward. Maybe Paul Krugman can chalk it up as a learning experience.

 

Preston Mui's picture
By Preston Mui at 5:09PM

French Health Care Facing Cost Problems

We're not the only one facing growing health care costs. France's single-payer system has solvency troubles of its own:

The problem is that Assurance Maladie has been in the red since 1989. This year the annual shortfall is expected to reach €9.4 billion ($13.5 billion), and €15 billion in 2010, or roughly 10% of its budget.

Even if single-payer or other forms of government-run health care are better than free-market health care, it still wouldn't make sense to initiate such a costly (and insolvent) program when our deficit is $1.3 trillion.

Drew Smith's picture
By Andrew Smith at 11:15AM

Healthcare Fail

Not only is Obama's flaunted healthcare overhaul completely unconstitutional, irresponsible, and extraordinarily wasteful, but now even Democrats won't rally to the cause. Obama is having to meet one on one with various members of his own party to pass this behemoth legislation. Leads one to wonder what will happen if it ever actually gets passed...

Also interesting is this list, released by the Republican House whip, of quotes from no less than 42 House Democrats who say for a variety of reasons that they cannot support the healthcare plan.


Read more here
Preston Mui's picture
By Preston Mui at 5:14PM

Arizona to Obamacare: Back off!

I wrote earlier about how Obamacare works: In order to ensure "universal coverage," the federal government is going to force individuals to buy insurance, whether or not it's a financially sound decision for them.

Well, the Arizona State Senate decided to make a stand for individual freedom on Monday (emphasis mine).

On Monday the Arizona state senate referred to the ballot a state constitutional amendment called the Health Care Freedom Act. The amendment, if approved by voters, would guarantee the right of Arizonans to make their own health care decisions, and to be free from coercion (directly or indirectly) with respect to participating in any health care system or plan.

More here. Hat tip to John Goodman.


Read more here
Preston Mui's picture
By Preston Mui at 6:17AM

"Cheaper" Health Care Bill Not So Cheap, Actually

After the public uproar over a health insurance plan that was going to cost as $1 trillion (or $2 trillion or $4 trillion, but who's counting?), the Democrats have put forth a new bill that claims to cost "only" $600 billion dollars over the next ten years.

The plan carries a 10-year price tag of slightly over $600 billion, and would lead toward an estimated 97 percent of all Americans having coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office, Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and Chris Dodd said in a letter to other members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

Don't let the lower numbers fool you. What the government has done here is not lowered the costs, but shifted the costs. To poor people, actually. How did they do it?

One way was to fine employers who fail to provide health insurance to their employees. But basic economics tells us that either a) labor will be more expensive and force employers to hire fewer employees (perhaps not such a good idea considering the latest jobs report), or b) employers will simply replace wages with health insurance, forcing employees to take a pay cut to enroll in a health insurance plan they probably don't want.

So either way, employees -- especially lower income employees -- get to pay for Obama's health care plan through more unemployment or lower wages.

You see, the original Obamacare plan went something like this: Obama and the Democrats wanted to claim that they created "universal coverage." So they simply mandated that everyone -- like it or not -- has to buy health insurance. People who were too poor to meet this mandate would be given a subsidy.

But that turned out to cost the government way too much money. I think James Capretta captures the essence of what the Democrats did:

Democrats used to be sympathetic to the financial strain these workers are under. But that was before CBO said their sympathy would be expensive. So now the emerging plan is to make tens of millions of Americans pay more than they do today for government-approved insurance organized by their employer. That’s really their only choice. If they don’t take it, they will face a large financial penalty. Great deal, huh?

A great deal, but only for the politicians! They get to take credit for universal health coverage with lower costs and no obvious tax increases. What a terrible deal for us.


Read more here
Robert Bentley's picture
By Robert Bentley at 2:28AM

ABC Refuses Opposition Ads During Gov't Broadcast

Two days ago we reported on ABC's White House special, which will cover the topic of health care overhaul and will be ran by Obama Administration officials.
Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 10:19PM

Obama’s Revenue Plans Hit Resistance in Congress

Reports the New York Times:
President Obama is running into stiff Congressional resistance to his plans to raise money for his ambitious agenda, and the resulting hole in the budget is threatening a major health care overhaul and other policy initiatives. The administration’s central revenue proposal — limiting the value of affluent Americans’ itemized deductions, including the one for charitable giving — fell flat in Congress, leaving the White House, at least for now, without $318 billion t

Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 11:38PM