Posts in "transparency"

Cody London's picture
By Cody London at 8:11AM

Goldman Sachs Promises Transparency?

I think the title alone says it all. Yeah, right...

An Associated Press article discusses how Goldman Sachs is "beginning" to "disclose" "more" "information" concerning how they make money in order to ensure that their business "practices" put their "clients first".  

A couple years too late, maybe? Thanks guys... This certainly is a convo starter. 

Now if we can only get some transparency at the Fed!?

Wes Messamore's picture
By Wesley Messamore at 7:06PM

Video: Obama's Transparency Promises

In my latest video Op Ed, I narrate a recent opinion editorial I wrote for The California Independent Voter Network about President Obama's mixed results on his transparency promises. You can view it below and are encouraged to share it and re-post it to your own blogs and Facebook profiles:

Julie Borowski's picture
By Julie Borowski at 9:53AM

The Fed's Increased Efforts to Hide Bailout Records

On Friday, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke gave a speech claiming that the economy is finally headed on the right track. He stated at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s annual economic symposium that "despite this recent slowing, however, it is reasonable to expect some pickup in growth in 2011 and in subsequent years."

Not so fast. It has become apparent that Ben Bernanke’s economic forecasts are rarely ever correct. Here are just a few quotes showing Ben Bernanke’s oblivion to the looming housing crisis from 2005 to 2007:

CNBC announcer Maria Bartiromo, July 2005: We have so many economists coming on our air and saying oh this is a [housing] bubble and it’s going to burst and this is going to be a real issue for the economy. Some say it could even create a recession at some point. What is the worst case scenario?

Ben Bernanke: I guess I don’t buy your premise. It’s a pretty unlikely possibility… I don’t think it’s going to drive the economy too far from its full employment path though…I’m hopeful and I’m confident in fact that the bank regulators will pay close attention to the kind of loans that are being made and making sure underwriting is done right.


Read more here
Julie Borowski's picture
By Julie Borowski at 10:02AM

Ron Paul Introduces SEC Transparency Act

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) whose purpose is to regulate the stock market and prevent corporate abuses has become no stranger to controversy. Recently, a Politico article revealed that top officials at the SEC spent a significant part of their day watching pornography on the taxpayer’s dime. Yet, the SEC pornography scandal resulted in zero firings. The former SEC chief admits that the commission failed to act when they received “credible and specific allegations” regarding the Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Cato Institute scholar Richard Rahn asserts that the existence of the SEC has made us less safe from financial fraud:

The budget for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) grew tenfold (to more than $1 billion) in the past 25 years, but there is no evidence it has made us any safer from financial fraud. In fact, the opposite seems to be the case. The Madoff Ponzi scheme was the biggest financial fraud ever. Yet when knowledgeable people presented evidence of the Madoff scheme to the SEC, they were just blown off. Now the SEC wants a bigger budget as a reward for its failure, and the agency and members of Congress are demanding more power for the SEC. The United States has many laws against financial fraud, so that is not the problem. The problem may be - in addition to SEC incompetence - that the public assumes the SEC is looking out for it and consequently fails to do proper due diligence. In other words, the existence of the SEC may be increasing rather than diminishing risk.

Upon the passage of the Dodd-Frank Financial Regulation bill, President Obama claimed “it will finally bring transparency to the kind of complex and risky transactions that helped trigger the financial crisis.”


Read more here
Alex Kharam's picture
By Alex Kharam at 6:30PM

So much for transparency...

Unfortunately, rumors that the Veep would have an actually transparent meeting were unfounded:

Unsubstantiated rumors that Vice President Joe Biden had suddenly gone a little loopy and ordered some of his official meetings opened to at least cursory public or media attention were just that -- unsubstantiated rumors.

After a recent public sighting, fears had mounted that the one-time, long-term senator might rebel against traditional White House strictures and start acting on all the administration's oft-promised promises of government transparency and official openness running back into 2008.

But the VP's public schedule today puts all those fears to rest.


Read more here
Preston Mui's picture
By Preston Mui at 7:08AM

Pelosi: "There has never been a more open process"

C-Span asks Democrats to televise hearings:

C-SPAN is asking Democrats to open healthcare negotiations to television cameras.

Democratic leaders have reportedly decided to skip formal conference and instead talk behind closed doors to reconcile the differences between the House and Senate bills.

Which is why...

Top House Democrats deflected the request, saying the process has been highly transparent, with the House holding over 100 public hearings. They pledged to make the final stages visible in part via the Internet. "There has never been a more open process for any legislation," Ms. Pelosi said.


Read more here
Robert Bentley's picture
By Robert Bentley at 5:12PM

Obama Holds Closed Door Meeting on Government Openness

In a story of irony, President Barack Obama held a closed door meeting to the public on the transparency of government.

From the AP:

It's hardly the image of transparency the Obama administration wants to project: A workshop on government openness is closed to the public.

The event Monday for federal employees is a fitting symbol of President Barack Obama's uneven record so far on the Freedom of Information Act, a big part of keeping his campaign promise to make his administration the most transparent ever. As Obama's first year in office ends, the government's actions when the public and press seek information are not yet matching up with the president's words.

"The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails," Obama told government offices on his first full day as president. "The government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears."

Read more here
Rachel Kania's picture
By Rachel Kania at 7:28PM

Senators attempt to water down "Audit the Fed" with new bill

We all expected this day to come. Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Bob Corker of Tennessee introduced their bill yesterday called " The Federal Reserve Accountability Act." 

Has a nice sound to it right? The bill is an attempt to get Congress to settle on a less powerful, more watered down version of "Audit the Fed." The bill introduced yesterday would not audit the Fed's inflationary powers and agreements with foreign banks. It would only provide a limitied audit of the TARP bailout, among others, allowing the people to know who their money has gone to.

However, the catch is that the names of the firms and institutions who received the TARP money would not be released until one year after the "emergency" program has ended. By that time most Americans will have moved on to a bigger issue created by the government. This bill is a way to compromise with the Fed and quiet those of us who want a FULL Audit! Do not let this slide! We can not except this. Call your senators and representatives who have co-sponsored the Audit the Fed bill and ask them not to step down, to stay true to who they are!

Preston Mui's picture
By Preston Mui at 11:38AM

What's in the Senate Bill?

We've written about H.R. 3200, the House version of Obamacare, a few times now. But that's the House bill -- what about the Senate bill? What new horror stories lie in that bill?

I wish I could enlighten you, but I can't -- the Senate HELP committee won't even let us read it.

On July 15, six weeks ago, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passed an amended $1 trillion health-care bill, with acting Chairman Chris Dodd calling it a "historic achievement." Too bad the committee won't reveal this history even to other Senators, much less to the public.

Three weeks ago Republicans on the committee wrote Mr. Dodd "to reiterate our request for a full copy of the bill as amended, in the four-week mark-up." Mr. Dodd has refused to comply. The Senate bill that is available on the committee Web site is 790 pages long. While that is some 300 pages shorter than the House health bill, that's in part because it doesn't include nearly 200 amendments that passed when the committee redrafted the bill.

Transparency my foot!

Isaac Shelton's picture
By Isaac Shelton at 6:11PM

Most transparent administration ever!!!

Barry

The Cash for Clunkers program has been hailed as too much of a success, but the Obama administration has refused to release all the details.

Most of the cars being sold through this program are Hondas, Toyotas, and Hyundais.  Government Motors isn't getting the money it had hoped for, which is probably frustrating for the UAW as well.

The real problem as I see it, is that Obama is not living up to yet another campaign promise.  We were promised openess and transparency and we get Robert Gibbs avoiding questions like Barney Frank avoids the health club.

Read more here.

Posted in: