Posts in "statism"

jasoncockrell's picture
By Jason Cockrell at 8:47AM

A New Conception of Statism

The Importance of Language

"Political chaos is connected with the decay of language," said George Orwell. He was right, of course. Language is the tool the mind uses to understand its interactions with the physical world. With an effective language, one identifies things for what they are. As politics relies heavily on mass deception, an obfuscation of language is always integral to the advancement of the state. With this in mind, I'd like to propose a new conception of statism.

The Free Dictionary defines "statism" as the practice or doctrine of giving a centralized government control over economic planning and policy. That's not a worthless definition, to be sure, but it leaves a bit to be desired. How much economic planning is enough to count as statism? Exactly how centralized is "centralized," really? Is it not also statism to advocate a coercive theocracy, even one which leaves the market comparatively unhindered?

With this in mind I propose to define "statism" as quite simply the belief that the state exists. This fits conveniently with other "-isms" such as theism and polylogism, and it suggests its own antonym, "astatism." Here I take "the state" to mean the legitimate monopoly on coercive governance in a geographic region. Statists, then, are those people who recognize a notion of such a monopoly. Most statists in America view the U.S. federal government as the state, though some prefer other organizations such as the North Carolina government.


Read more here
RyanE4Liberty's picture
By Ryan Ekvall at 9:44AM

What Will Replace Statism?

Albert Jay NockIn Walter E. William's autobiography, Up From The Projects, the economist recalls a lecture he gave in South Africa around the time apartheid was coming to an end. Williams told South Africans their problem "wasn't ending apartheid but figuring out what was going to replace it."

After reading Albert Jay Nock's Memoirs of a Superfluous Man, I wonder if we needn't have the same concern in our society today. Instead of apartheid, we need to replace statism. Nock proposes the New Deal was the final writing on the wall for the American people, in kind with Nazism, Communism and Fascism -- that is, just another form of statism. Our society would necessarily degenerate and eventually crumble like Rome after the fall of Marcus Aurelias.

"History goes on to its end, carrying all incidental and temporary leadership in its sweep, and throwing it away when it has served its little shred of particular purpose," writes Nock.  So, after the American presidency is dethroned, what comes next? According to Nock, after the dust clears comes more statism, as the cycle simply repeats itself. The majority of people don't want the responsibility of liberty, but love its rhetoric -- kind of like a certain popular religion.

My question is this: if we perceive correctly that America is dangerously close to an imperceivable edge, what happens when the wheels come off? And if we are to replace the current wheels with liberty, what happens when the brakes cannot stop us from going off that imperceivable edge?

BrianMUGA's picture
By Brian Underwood at 10:12AM

The Minimum Wage -- the Triple Sin of Statism

Like so many other "Progressive" governmental economic policies, the federal minimum wage can be traced back to FDR and the New Deal, certainly one of the most expansive government programs in the history of the United States. Wildly popular amongst the left and supported by the Republican Party for political points, the minimum wage was first established in 1933 and has continued to plague the American economy ever since, the brief span between 1935 and 1938 in which the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional notwithstanding. No longer are business agreements between employer and employee sealed with a handshake; instead, they are determined by a lawmaker's pen and enforced by the barrel of a gun.

In short, the minimum wage should be abolished, but before moving into the moral and economic reasons surrounding why the minimum wage should be $0.00, the first and most obvious reason resides in jurisprudence - namely, the correct interpretation of Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of our Constitution: the Commerce Clause. As it reads, "[The Congress shall have the Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." Careful observers will note that withing the Commerce Clause, there exists only one power delegated to Congress: the power "To regulate Commerce." It is one power which is equally applied to three separate spheres of authority, not three spheres each with their own particular powers.

 Moreover, this clause merely gives Congress the power to regulate commerce between sovereign, political entities, not within them...

See full post here.

TJ Baurain's picture
By Tom Baurain at 10:34AM

Delaware DOT Keeps Kids Safe from Basketball

Sounds a bit like an Onion headline, doesn't it? Every now and again there are instances of an overly intrusive government that defy logic and demand greater context. This video below is an interview with a resident of a Delaware town concerning the removal of basketball hoops in his neighborhood. Why the Delaware Department of Transportation is seizing private property is beyond me. Watch the video embedded below, and read on. 


Read more here
Eric Sharp. ETF's picture
By Eric Sharp at 10:04AM

The Libertarian Allegory of TRON Legacy

imageI recently viewed Tron Legacy and was enamored with the message of freedom, individualism, and anti-statism. If you haven't seen it yet, go watch  it now.

!POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT!


Read more here
Dan John's picture
By Dan John at 7:41AM

The Statist Answer to the Tea Party Is 'One [OPPRESSED] Nation'

On Saturday, October 2, at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C., tens of thousands of like-minded altruists who think that more goverment control, programs, and spending is the answer to every problem imaginable, came together from all over the nation to be in one place and celebrate the epic failures  of such idealogies like marxism, socialism, and collectivism as "One Nation." 

The crowd was diverse...in some ways:  It was compiled of people from many different socio-ecnomic classes, races, sizes, shapes, sexual orientations, ethnicities, and genders, as well as members of a number of different organizations.  All, however, were united in their support of statism.

       

Attending groups included Communist Party USA , Democratic Socialists of America, Green for All, the Gray Panthers, the NAACP, Color of Change  Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. and the International Socialist Organization, to name a few. It was so delightful to see so many people who believe in human rights, peace, equal rights for all, and humanitarianism come together to support such a "peace-loving" idealism of the dark ages like socialism! </sarcasm>

Zak Slayback's picture
By Zak Slayback at 8:49AM

What do Tetris and Communism have in common? Everything. Kind of.

I recently stumbled across one of the greatest pieces of creative genius on YouTube that I've ever seen. Ever.

The British Artists Dan Woods and Donald Newholm, "Pig With The Face of a Boy" are collectively known as "the world's best neo-post-post-music hall anti-folk band." And by George, they are. 


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 6:52AM
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 9:56AM

Said vs. Heard

At the risk of sounding really whiny, this is great.

image

(via)

Seth Mann's picture
By Seth Mann at 9:21AM

Robert Taft Fights Back: The Old Right "Whips" the New Deal

Arm yourself in the battle of ideas against Obama's New New Deal (see the end of this post).Obama New New Deal

Robert Taft (1888-1953) was a prominent member of what is now known as the "Old Right" and an ardent anti-New Dealer. He is well-known for his non-interventionist foreign policy which he described in his book A Foreign Policy for Americans (available as a pdf from the Mises Institue). He opposed the New Deal and World War II, took a principled stand against the Nuremberg Trials as victor's justice, balanced the scales of labor and management that the New Dealers had tipped to the unions, and was named one of the five greatest senators in American history by John F. Kennedy in his Profiles in Courage.


Read more here