Posts in "recession"

ndyer123's picture
By Nick Dyer at 7:34PM

The Jobs Through Growth Act

The Republican Study Committee (RSC) has drafted a bill called The Jobs Through Growth Act, H.R. 3400, which is supposed to significantly reduce the federal burden on businesses and encourage business owners to begin hiring again.  The RSC, led by Chairman Jim Jordan, has combined several pieces of legislation that relieve job producers by reducing personal & corporate income taxes, eliminates the death tax (which is essentially double taxation), cuts regulatory bloat by exempting small businesses, addresses energy issues and much more.  This bill would be an immediate boon to the economy by eliminating the government-driven uncertainty that our economy is facing.  (See the details of the bill below the jump.)

Most -- if not all -- of the elements of the bill would have an immediate positive impact on the economy.  The reduction of taxes allows individuals to decide how they would like to spend their money, rather than some incompetent member of the federal government.  Allowing foreign profits to repatriated at a lower rate will encourage investment and spending in the US rather than overseas.  The reductions of red tape could provide the biggest benefits for the economy.  The amount of money spent on complying with government regulations can now be spent on more employees or can be passed along to the consumer reducing prices across the board.  Another way prices could immediately be lowered is with the relief provided by the energy reform portions of the bill, if energy is cheaper, everything can be cheaper.

The only issues with the bill are that the RSC doesn’t go far enough in reducing taxes and there is no reduction of spending implemented into the bill.  If the bill is passed, the tax cuts are going to have to be matched by a cut in spending; otherwise the national debt goes up.  The bill should have addressed this by introducing real spending cuts in areas where the federal government has no place spending our hard-earned dollars.  


Read more here
Megan Duffield's picture
By Megan Duffield at 12:35PM

Bernanke is Lost in the Dark

No tallies were added to the job board in August and President Obama will be stepping in to help with a proposed plan of $447 billion in stimulus money. The plan will provide for unemployment benefits, payroll tax cuts, infrastructure, and security cash so teachers, firefighters, and cops don't get laid off -- we can't have employees who aren't economically justified become unemployed!

Let me remind the readers here today that we are currently over $14 trillion dollars in debt and the government has passed numerous stimulus packages that most likely need to be renamed to avoid accusations of false advertising. As all of the failed policies pass us, one by one, the head of our central bank can't even seem to grasp what is going on around him.

Bernanke this week admitted to being puzzled about consumer spending. He stated:

Even taking into account the many financial pressures they face, households seem exceptionally cautious.

Seem? Isn't he supposed to be in touch with the economy and aware of why consumers aren't spending?  I hold no PhD in economics, nor have I run any sort of financial institution, but I can say that when I see my personal finances drying up, I save my money. So when Americans see their country's balance sheet reach the height it has, while the government gives us no reason for new confidence in future fiscal conservatism, they protect what they have.

Continue reading...

BrianMUGA's picture
By Brian Underwood at 7:06PM

Who do they work for, really?

It's been two years since the financial collapse, and where are we now? Our unemployment is hovering around 9.8%, our dollar is failing from the policies of the Federal Reserve Bank, and our national debt has increased by trillions, but take  heart! Those on Wall Street continue to live in the lap of luxury.

Because of the bailouts and further intervention by the Fed, our nation's financial system has been artificially inflated by the theft and reallocation of the incomes of individual Americans. Rather than doing its duty and staying out of the economy, the federal government continues to intervene and reward bad behavior, causing far more harm than good. All the while, the practices that led us here have not changed, and the American people are having their wages legally robbed from them to help the bankers on Wall Street.

So ask yourself:  Do your Congressmen work for you, or for the lobbyists and special interests?

Barry Kuzay's picture
By Barry Kuzay at 7:06PM

The Recession is over! Really, it is! Now go buy stuff!

The recession is over, at least according to the official version of history as the National Bureau of Economic Research (a private nonprofit group, despite the name) wants to see it.  I think if they declare it just a few more times, that will make it happen.  Poof.

I am glad I read this article, though, because otherwise I would not have even known that this is only a post-war recession we're experiencing!  Luckily the experts are here to inform us:

The December 2007-to-June 2009 recession is two months longer than the two previous longest postwar recessions, in 1973-75 and 1981-82. Between 1945 and 2001, there have been 10 recessions that on average lasted 10 months, according to the NBER.

Notice how the article refers to the panel of experts that came to these conclusions, without naming any of the supposed experts. Not that it matters. The overlords have spoken. I'm just here to grovel and thank their boots for the good news.

Nick Davies's picture
By Nicholas Davies at 10:19AM
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 1:40PM

The Autumn of Nothing but Ramen Noodles for Dinner

"The Summer of Recovery is apparently sliding into the Autumn of Nothing but Ramen Noodles for Dinner."

Oh, Jon Stewart.  So great.

Kevin Brett's picture
By Kevin Brett at 3:41PM

I Don't Wanna Grow Up; I'm A Boomerang Kid!

The New York Times published an article today citing the emerging phenomenon of delayed financial independence for the 20-something generation.  In typical NYT fashion, the article makes every attempt to discount the economic condition as a fundamental contributor to the shifting social order.  Instead, "emerging adulthood" psychology professor, Jeffrey Arnett, is called upon to bring credence to the idea that the "failure to launch" generation is influenced just as greatly (if not more) by their tendency towards liberalized decision making as opposed to the economic landscape.  

Kids don’t shuffle along in unison on the road to maturity. They slouch toward adulthood at an uneven, highly individual pace. Some never achieve all five milestones [completing school, leaving home, becoming financially independent, marrying and having a child], including those who are single or childless by choice, or unable to marry even if they wanted to because they’re gay. Others reach the milestones completely out of order, advancing professionally before committing to a monogamous relationship, having children young and marrying later, leaving school to go to work and returning to school long after becoming financially secure.

While the article does provide insight into the collective psyche of "the boomerang kids", the overall analysis weighs too heavily in favor of a newfound paradigm of personal choice and not the reality of lacking options.  This should come as no surprise, as the NYT has been one of the foremost advocates of the "hopeful change" socialization process.  It's much easier to chalk the newly destitute workforce up as a youthful generation grappling with the real-world application of whimsical idealistic fantasies than to take responsibility for a fundamental failure in economic policy and the inability to address the root causes of our problems.

Jeremy Davis's picture
By Jeremy Davis at 9:08AM

Leaving Afghanistan Behind

When it comes to armed conflict, timelines for withdrawal mean nothing if the war is undeclared. Goals are always set in the vaguest of terms with the intention of prolonging the conflict to establish a long-term commitment and remove all possibilities of a total and complete withdraw.

So when we are told by the Obama Administration that the end is near for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s far too easy to be skeptical. The president’s intentionally vague plan to begin removing U.S. troops from Afghanistan in July 2011 is nothing more than a continuance of his campaign rhetoric meant to portray his administration as a sponsor of peace. Surely we haven’t forgotten about the president’s Nobel Peace Prize.

Now we hear calls by U.S. military leaders for the president to stunt his plans for a rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan on the argument that we’re just now getting it right after nine years. Those fearful of a swift withdrawal from Afghanistan can be rest assured that if there can be found a way for the government to drag its feet and reverse its commitments in the removal of U.S. troops, it will be used.


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 4:33PM

The Shape of the Recession

Options include(from least to most grim):  V, U, W, WW, L.  Wait, maybe that last one really ought to be |________.   From Mish Shedlock's Global Economic Trend Analysis:

The global slowdown – already evident in second-quarter data for 2010 – will accelerate in the second half of the year. Fiscal stimulus will disappear as austerity programs take hold in most countries. Inventory adjustments, which boosted growth for a few quarters, will run their course. The effects of tax policies that stole demand from the future – such as incentives for buyers of cars and homes – will diminish as programs expire. Labor-market conditions remain weak, with little job creation and a spreading sense of malaise among consumers....Avoiding double dip [or W] recession will be difficult....Fasten your seat belts for a very bumpy ride.

Shedlock himself is even less optimistic, noting that an L-shaped recession is indeed possible:

More likely to me is something like an "L" or a "WW" kind of scenario with the U.S. slipping in and out of recession for a prolonged period of time, perhaps 3-4 years or more....

If the Fed and Congress drag this out, which at this point seems likely, we will see a severe "L" or "WW" shaped recession playing out over several (or more) years.

It's a fairly dire picture, to say the least.  Read more of Shedlock's reasoning behind his prediction here.

Nick Leavens's picture
By Nick Leavens at 12:02PM

Double Dip Recessions and What to Do about Them

In stark contrast to a story last week that painted President Fanklin Roosevelt as the greatest U.S. President of all time, a story in today's Washington Post asks if President Obama isn't perhaps following in the same economic missteps that FDR took in the mid to late 1930's. 

By fixating on the debt and stimulus plans, Obama and Congress are overlooking challenges to the economy from taxes, employment and the entrepreneurial environment. President Roosevelt's great error was to ignore such factors -- and the result was that sickening double dip.

Ah, yes, the infamous double dip.  Good when in reference to ice cream consumption, but scary when mentioned in regards to economic patterns.  It's too bad that the author completely shrugs off the fact that the inability of President Obama and Congress to correctly deal with the debt that our nation holds is the poison that continues to strangle our economy.  Economic strategist, and candidate for U.S. Senate in Connecticut, Peter Schiff explains why double dips happen in the first place  in this video from December '09.