Posts in "Progressivism"

joel.hills's picture
By Joel Hills at 11:31AM

Twelve Steps to Admitting Neoconservatism is Progressivism

Liberty Through Superior Firepower

First off, my personal ideological testimony.

Having always had a healthy distaste for authority, I hate to admit I started my political journey as a “rebellious” liberal.  That is, until I realized the logical concessions one must make in persisting as a statist.  For instance, one must, all at once, distrust the government searching the home one harbors no umbrage toward the government having purchased for one in the first place. 

So, I moved on down the ideological line.

Being a passionate reactionary, I soon stumbled awkwardly into full-on mainstream, “kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out,” neo-conservativism.  My foreign policy position basically mirrored the plot of an episode of G.I. Joe.  I entered into every episode knowing who was the good guy and bad guy; I knew the good guy was always right; and knowing was “half the battle.”


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 5:45PM

Get Progressives to Take You Seriously

In the spirit of Shaun's recent (hilarious) post on how not to run a recruitment table, here's Steve Horwitz on how to be taken seriously by progressives:

Stop treating Progressives as either evil or stupid....let’s work on the assumption that Progressives are, in Hayek’s words, guilty of nothing more than “intellectual error” about the way the world works (and the economy in particular).  Seize this opportunity to teach, without condescension, rather than calling names.  Yes, I know this is hard when you head over to the Daily Kos and see libertarians called racist, homophobic, cold-hearted pawns of the corporations.  So be it.  We need to take the high road.

Second, libertarians have a tendency to do something that drives Progressives nuts, as it should: They blame the victim. Too often I hear self-described libertarians blame poverty on the culture or morality of the poor.  Similar generalizations about racial and ethnic groups have been known to escape the lips of libertarians.... Progressives are right that these social pathologies are largely structural, but they are wrong about which structures cause them. Why don’t libertarians start by agreeing with the premise, then engaging our Progressive friends in a conversation about how government intervention is responsible for most of what they are rightly concerned about?  That’s more interesting and productive than trying to defend ourselves from charges of bigotry.

Finally, libertarians need to be attentive to the difference between being “pro-market” and “pro-business.”

Read the rest of this great article here.  (h/t)

Dan John's picture
By Dan John at 5:02PM

7 Reasons Why Libertarians Are More "Progressive" than Social Liberals

Socialists claim to be "more progressive" than conservatives. This may be true, but libertarians are far more progressive than both sides.  Libertarians value both economic and social freedoms, while the right only bothers with the former and the left with the latter.  Libertarianism promotes the virtures of self-sufficency, individual liberty, a peaceful and mature foreign policy, and equal individual and economic freedom for all.  Here are seven detailed reasons why libertarians are the true progressives:

7.  Socialists believe that government is the answer to everything. It is the all-knowing, all-powerful, authoratarian ruler of all. By contrast, libertarians believe that individuals have the right and responsibility to govern themselves.

6. The left is famous to dividing people into  "minority" groups. This creates segragation. Libertarians contend that all should have equal rights -- their sexual orientation, race, gender, eye color, hair color, or favorite flavor of ice cream are secondary to the fact that they are individuals.


Read more here
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 9:28PM

Logic vs. Government

My latest column at the Daily Caller analyzes the logical fallacies contained in base progressive thought, using Jon Stewart's recent critique of libertarians as a perfect example of an illogical progressive argument, and then applies this analysis to the recent healthcare bill.

...An analysis of the history of government reveals that even government actions with good intent usually end up resulting in negative consequences. Just consider the governmental policies over the past 50 years intended to make home ownership affordable for all Americans. Such actions led directly to an economic collapse that specifically hit the housing market, and thus homeowners, like never before...

...With this view of logic in mind, one can now understand why libertarians are so upset with the recent health care reform. The government-minded leftist would argue that those against the reform do not think that everyone should have access to quality health care, or were content with the current system. Neither is true, and it is in fact often the libertarian’s desire to see affordable health care for as many as possible that drives the protests of Obamacare...

Read the rest here.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 11:59AM

Progressivism originated in corporatism, not populism.

Writing on the origins of the Federal Reserve, Murray Rothbard discussed the philosophy which helped produce it and which still dominates our political discourse today:  progressivism.  It's not a commonly used word in modern politics, though it has of late become more popular as a self-descriptor on the left.  Nonetheless, progressivism is a philosophy of social democracy, based in the general will of Rousseau, which seeks to improve society -- to make it progress -- through government intervention and programs. 

Most examples of what is now called a "liberal" or a "leftist" is much more accurately termed a "progressive."  (The distinction is important, I promise.  Who hasn't been confused or confusing when trying to talk about classical liberalism with those who think of "liberals" as people who support overwhelming government intervention in the economy?  Call them progressives instead and your problem goes away.)  At any rate, Rothbard writes:

The Federal Reserve Act of December 23, 1913, was part and parcel of the wave of Progressive legislation on local, state, and federal levels of government that began about 1900. Progressivism was a bipartisan movement that, in the course of the first two decades of the 20th century, transformed the American economy and society from one of roughly laissez-faire to one of centralized statism.


Read more here