Posts in "Privacy"

JohnMcKenna's picture
By John McKenna at 9:58AM

Massachusetts Cops At it Again

Hey guess what -- the police want to take away more of your privacy rights! How? Technology!

Yes that's right, in Massachusetts, Governor Deval Patrick last month signed off on $500,000 in grants to local police to monitor license plates using technology that can scan a plate and put it into a central computer. The goal of this technology is to better apprehend criminals and stolen cars, but civil rights groups are complaining that law-abiding citizens may be caught in the policeman's net as a result of this law. Also, there is a danger that by monitoring a car, anybody can access information on anybody that they want just by tracking where the car went.

Now I don't fault the police for wanting to get the technological edge in fighting crime. In fact, it is technological advances in forensics and evidence-gathering that have reduced the number of wrongful arrests and incarceration. That being said, we must be careful that we aren't using technology to spy on innocent citizens or intrude too much into their private lives. We should never have to trade security for liberty, under any circumstances, because if we do, they will both be taken from us.

Originally posted at www.silverunderground.com.

ndirish0310's picture
By Kristian Moriarty at 1:57PM

Kidnap of the Fourth Amendment

The Fourth Amendment is dying and we’re all the murderers, according to 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals Chief Justice Alex Kozinski and his law clerk Stephanie Grace. In an article for TheDaily.com titled “Pulling Plug on Privacy; How Technology Helped Make Privacy Obsolete,” Kozinski and Grace eulogize the Fourth Amendment, recognizing the diminished expectation of privacy that every American has today.

With the increased use of smart phones that track our GPS location at every moment, police no longer need a warrant to track your everyday movements. In a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, individuals who communicate information to another person no longer have an expectation of privacy regarding that information (United States v. White, 1971). It is by this logic that government agencies are able to obtain information about your everyday movements without a warrant. The agencies argue that since you have sent that data via your smartphone to your cell phone provider, they do not need a warrant to obtain that information from your cell phone provider.

The problem with this logic is that most people reasonably believe that they are not subject to being tracked by the government simply because they own a smartphone.


Read more here
JohnMcKenna's picture
By John McKenna at 10:06AM

A Quicker Way to Violate your Civil Liberties

imageIf you’re a frequent flyer, you’re probably fed up with having to go through security each time you want to get on a plane and travel, especially when that security involves the potential for X-rays or pat-downs. Don’t you wish there was a quicker way of going through security? Well, the good people at the TSA sympathize with you, and are offering express security screenings to get you on the plane faster if you fly frequently.

This fall, the TSA will be testing out express security in Atlanta, Detroit, Miami, and Dallas. Intended for those who fly often, it will allow certain people to go through security without needing to take off your shoes or taking your laptop out of your bag, saving travelers a fair bit of time, and enabling passengers to zip right through security while everybody else fiddles around with their belongings.

However, this program comes with a catch. To qualify for the program, you need to give the TSA some “added personal information,” such as personal contacts and your travel history, to make sure terrorists aren’t “gaming” the system. What the trade-off comes down to is you give up more of your private information in exchange for speed, and you still might be subject to a pat-down. If this plan goes into effect, travelers will be faced with two options: go through the traditional pat-down x-ray security that takes forever, or go through the speedy, more invasive security that swaps privacy for convenience. It’s better than having just one option, but when the TSA is providing those choices, you’re merely choosing which is the more preferable assault on your civil liberties.

H/T Campaign for Liberty. Originally published at www.silverunderground.com.

Shaun Bowen's picture
By Shaun Bowen at 10:22AM

FedEx Bombs = Pat Downs?

Maybe it's just me, but is our "security" sector is becoming more and more sexually deviant?

Following Sept 11th, one could make the arguement that more security was needed. So things like knives, box cutters, and scissors were banned from airplane. After the "shoe-bomber" Richard Reid, we could no longer carry a lighter onto a plane, though they graciously gave that back to us. These things, though intrusive, had at least some semblence of sanity when it came protecting our air travel.

Of course, once the government begins something like this, it's never satisfied, so when the "underwear-bomber" gave us a scare on Christmas we were told to lose what little was left in the way of privacy.

This is when the perversion really took off with the introduction of the fancy "full body x-ray" systems. Now men, women, and even children are having their naked bodies revealed and photographed by the TSA. Don't worry, though -- it's all in the name of security, right? Again, putting pedophiliac imaging to the side, logically it makes sense that if we see under your clothes, we can prevent this type bombing that other detectors seemed to miss. 

So when packages made with questionable materials show up in FedEx's airplanes, we would expect to see things like better screening of cargo, and purhaps bomb sniffing dogs at FedEx's terminals right? Wrong.


Read more here
Zak Slayback's picture
By Zak Slayback at 10:14AM

Snyder v. Phelps: Right to Free Speech vs. Right to Privacy

image

"It is the obligation of Westboro Baptist Church to put the cup of God's fury to America's lips, and cause America to drink it. And you will drink it!"

- Rev. Fred Phelps, Westboro Baptist Church

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) started hearing arguments in a highly controversial case on Wednesday. Snyder v. Phelps  is arguably the highest profile free speech case that the High Court will hear this term.


Read more here
Shaun Bowen's picture
By Shaun Bowen at 2:05PM

Welcome, Mark Zuckerberg, to the world you created . . . like it or not.

When recently asked about his company's privacy problems, Mark Zuckerberg, head of Facebook, stated "the age of privacy is over." Sadly for Mr.Zuckerberg, he didn't know how true that statement would turn out to be.

The well known Hollywood gossip website Gawker combined with another website known as Valleywag to start a new campaign to photograph the Facebook CEO everywhere and anywhere he goes and put it up on the web. Photos ranging from him at a park to sitting at home have all been put together and posted at Gawker in an attempt to destroy any privacy that Zuckerberg might have.

"Facebook's CEO doesn't seem too preoccupied about your privacy, or about ours," says Ryan Tate, editor of the gossip website Valleywag, which posted the photographs. "Likewise, we weren't bothered by the notion of tailing him around the Valley for a few days, or about sharing the experience with you...

"If it feels a little naughty to take such a close look into Zuckerberg's life, remember that this is the executive who pushed the private information of Facebook's hundreds of millions of users progressively further into the public sphere," Tate said.

Though I doubt much will actually change from this, I applaude these bloggers for standing up for the right of privacy, though -- ironically -- their careers are spent destroying it for the Hollywood elite.

Aaron Ricks's picture
By Aaron Ricks at 9:24AM

State Governments Have Your Baby's DNA

This information seemed kind of obvious to me, but still it's worth reporting.  Some state governments have decided to store samples of newborn DNA -- in some cases indefinitely. And only Minnesota and Texas have the necessary forms and process to destroy the DNA samples.

For all the crap the rest of the union gives to Texas  (I remind you, I'm a New York elitist), I am glad the Lone Star State is an example in this regard.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 12:36PM

Creepy Proposal from the Head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

The Head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a close confidant of Obama, proposed less than two years ago in an academic paper that the government pay covert agents and "independent" advocates to infiltrate groups which speak against the government and/or propose conspiracy theories.  The idea, Glenn Greenwald explains, is that "[t]his would be designed to increase citizens' faith in government officials and undermine the credibility of conspiracists.  The paper's abstract can be read, and the full paper downloaded, here. "  Though the administration has not yet moved toward accepting this proposal, it is certainly concerning given the fact that the paper was written recently and its writer is now in exactly the position he would need to execute the scheme.

Jihan Huq's picture
By Jihan Huq at 9:32PM

Man Convicted of Indecent Exposure for Being Naked in His Own Home

"Most people have done it or do it on a daily basis. I think it's a common thing to be naked in your home," said Erick Williamson.

Yes, it's true. Erick Williamson was convicted of indecent exposure for being naked in his own home.

The story gets interesting when Yvette Dean, a wife of a local county officer, insinuated that Williamson was purposely exposing himself from his own home. Dean was also reported to have been content with the conviction (according to Fox 5).

The judge ruled out that since Williamson was seen more than once in the course of several hours (even though it was still in his home), he labled the demeanor "indecent."  Though Williamson was convicted, all witnesses testified that he made no inappropriate gestures and didn't even step out of his own home!

Williamson stated: "I feel the exact feelings that they're speaking-I've put onto the other people. They're looking into my home. I live in a fishbowl, an ant farm. Everyone's looking inside my house now. That's ok."

Williamson is not anticipated to serve any jail time.

Posted in:
Barry Kuzay's picture
By Barry Kuzay at 12:01PM

FBI biometric photo scanning at the DMV

AHuxley at Slashdot reports:

DMV

The FBI is getting fast new systems to look at local North Carolina license photos via the DMV. As the FBI is not authorized to collect and store the photos, they use the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles. The system takes seconds to look at chin widths and nose sizes. The expanded technology used on millions of motorist could be rolled out across the USA. The FBI's Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System is also getting an upgrade to DNA records, 3-D facial imaging, palm prints and voice scans.

Slashdot is a great site for those who love technology, but more importantly, it seems to be run by libertarians. (They ran quite a few stories on Ron Paul during the presidential campaign.)