Accurate Perceptions of the IRS
Here is an IRS publication which consists of 27 examples of the legal system protecting the government's right to your money. The first mention of a jury is one that acquitted, but it is immediately followed by a similar case in which the jury convicted.
All of the other seven mentions of jury decisions are convictions in favor of the IRS. Nobody likes to admit their mistakes, but wouldn't it be wise to keep a healthy record of the mistakes that a government bureaucracy makes? In fact, shouldn't that be one of the functions of the IRS? The website, irs.gov, contains five documents with the words "jury acquitted" and 52 with the words "jury convicted." The internet itself contains about 85,000 (according to Google) pages with IRS and "jury convicted" in them, and about 25,000 with IRS and "jury acquitted."
So why is the ratio of convictions to acquittals on the Internet so much lower than it is on the IRS site? Perhaps a clue can be found in the case of the Rutherfords, who may have suffered from a jury whose judgment was compromised by a fear of audits. Bullies only retain their power as long as they continue being bullies. If they wish to have power some other way, they must learn to cooperate instead of intimidate.
Read more here














Social Networks for YAL