Posts in "Interventionism"

aheram's picture
By Jayel Aheram at 12:53PM

Obama's Silent Complicity in the Egyptian Crackdown

Kristen Chick reporting on the Obama Administration’s silent complicity in the brutal crackdown of protesters at Tahrir Square by the Egyptian military:

In recent months, Egypt’s military rulers have become increasingly repressive – torturing with impunity, jailing bloggers, sending more than 12,000 civilians to military tribunals, and using excessive force against protesters, killing dozens. Yet as the abuses have stacked up, the US has mostly refrained from public criticism of Egypt’s military, whose $1.3 billion in US aid could come under review if critics in Congress prevail. Washington’s relative silence has created the appearance that the US has returned to its Mubarak-era policy of turning a blind eye to its ally’s abuses to preserve the relationship.

“We can't fall into the position where it looks like we've given the SCAF a blank check,” says Michael Wahid Hanna, a fellow at The Century Foundation in New York. “If this doesn’t change soon, the United States is going to be in a very difficult position because it'll be seen to have not learned any of the lessons of the Arab Spring. And we'll be right back where we started – supporting stability for stability's sake, even in light of the continuation of many of the same practices that triggered the whole uprising to begin with.”

Not just silent complicity in the brutal repression of legitimate protests, but as reported by The Guardian, active and material support for the oppressors as well:

Two US companies have shipped crowd control munitions and teargas to Egypt – one firm repeatedly – in the midst of violent and often lethal crackdowns on protesters by security forces, according to an Amnesty International investigation.


Read more here
Roadkill's picture
By Alan Brooks at 12:34PM

The Dangers of Libya

image

As rebel fighters take the capitol city of Tripoli, we should remember the dangers of meddling in foreign affairs. The Obama administration has called for Muammar Gaddafi to step down and allow the rebels to take control of the country. We have helped the rebels to overthrow Gaddafi's government with the assistance of NATO forces.


Read more here
GClift's picture
By Gerald Clift at 11:06AM

U.S. and Allies Financing Taliban and al-Qaeda

One of the many reasons our strategy in the Middle East is doomed to fail is that it only addresses two parts of a three- part problem (and it isn't doing the two parts very well, either):  We're fighting the people who executed 9/11 (al-Qaeda), we're fighting the people who harbored the people who executed 9/11 (the Taliban), but why are we doing absolutely nothing against the people who finance these groups?

Because the people that finance them are the U.S. and our allies:

image

 "Saudi donors remain the chief financiers of Sunni militant groups like Al-Qaeda."  Hillary Clinton has said “it has been an ongoing challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat terrorist financing from Saudi Arabia as a strategic priority.”

As outrageous as it is that our ally is funding our enemy, it is even more outrageous what the U.S. is doing to fund our enemy.

The "US military's contractors are forced to pay suspected insurgents to protect American supply routes. It is an accepted fact of the military logistics operation in Afghanistan that the US government funds the very forces American troops are fighting. And it is a deadly irony, because these funds add up to a huge amount of money for the Taliban."

And today an audit by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction shows that the billions in aid we have sent to Afghanistan may be funding our enemies as well.

If a company rented a factory to use for pumping toxic waste into nearby lakes, it wouldn't make sense to only go after the factory employees (al-Qaeda) and the owner's of the factory (Taliban).  If we ignored the company funding the whole operation, there would be nothing to stop them from renting another factory and doing the whole operation over and over again.

Unfortunately, that appears to be exactly our strategy in Afghanistan.

Brian Beyer's picture
By Brian Beyer at 12:54PM

One More War: Why the Hell Not?

Cross posted at the Antiwar.com blog. Come and check it out!

A new expose from the Nation by Jeremy Scahill detailing the CIA’s same, old dirty tricks is certainly troubling. Candidate Obama assured the American public that extrajudicial actions by the CIA and Defense Department were a thing of the past. Transparency, much like hope and change, were buzz words that were constantly used to show everybody that the era of Bush was over. A new ethical era was to take hold in the White House, and would be anchored by Nancy Pelosi’s vow to oversee a Congress of integrity.

Just as Obama campaigned to make the most sweeping changes when it came to the realm of foreign policy (Guantanamo Bay, ending the war in Iraq, ending torture, etc.), it was in foreign policy that he became the most like Bush. In fact, many would argue that Obama has not only continued many of Bush’s odious practices, but has institutionalized all of these practices because of his refusal to change course.

While the secret prison that was discussed in length surely was troubling, it almost seems like the least of worries when compared to some of the statements made by officials concerning future plans for Somalia. And yes, that comparison still holds for a prison “infested with bedbugs and mosquitoes” that result in prisoners getting rashes, prompting them to “scratch themselves incessantly.”


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 10:17AM

US Interventionism: Mapped

image

Here's a great interactive map from Mother Jones showing U.S. military presence worldwide over time (click on the image to make it work).  Hat tip to the Campaign for the Accountability of American Bases.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 9:26AM

Bin Laden Protesters Are Not Irrational

Originally posted on my blog.

image

image

As might have been expected, protests have erupted in the Middle East against the U.S. over the death of Osama bin Laden.

Now, obviously bin Laden did some awful things and was, to one degree or another, responsible for the unwarranted death of many.  However, these protesters — though perhaps uneducated, or to some extent misinformed — are not irrational; they’re protesting with…I hesitate to say “good reason,” given the more harmful courses of action sometimes taken… but certainly with a reason.  It’s the same reason bin Laden’s cause was popular, and it’s written right on their signs:  They want to be left alone — and U.S. foreign policy persistently doesn’t do that.

As the former chief of the CIA's Osama bin Laden unit Michael Scheuer wrote about bin Laden and his supporters, "The focused and lethal threat posed to U.S. national security arises not from Muslims being offended by what America is, but rather from their plausible perception that the things they most love and value—God, Islam, their brethren, and Muslim lands—are being attacked by America." Or, to put it more simply, "They hate us for what we do, not who we are."


Read more here
Matt Cockerill's picture
By Matt Cockerill at 12:38PM

Christopher Hitchens calls for Intervention in Libya

In terms of sheer ability, Christopher Hitchens is probably the most gifted essayist of our time (Gore Vidal was likely his superior, but that great man of letters has -- sadly -- fallen prey to a creeping senility). Consistently presenting un-PC perspectives on issues ranging from gender to God, Hitch is never unwilling to offend. I commend him to all of you, and not in spite of the fact that he pugnaciously rejects the libertarian (i.e. pro-peace, pro-market) outlook, but because of that. 

But his political intuitions -- for example, his youthful flirtation with Marxism and outright participation in the Cuban Revolution -- are scarcely trustworthy. Thus should we turn a skeptical eye to his calls for some sort of intervention in Libya, as elucidated in his recent column for Slate.

To Hitch (and all those asking for a "humanitarian" intervention in Libya) I ask:

Is a third war in 10 years in the Middle East really a good idea? What are the likely (both geopolitical and humanitarian) consequences of such an intervention? If intervention in Libya is justified because Muammar Gaddafi is executing dissidents, then why aren't we marching on half of the Arab League?

Roy Antoun's picture
By Roy Antoun at 11:57AM

Somalian Blowback

The NY Times reported today that Somalia has been experiencing more violent turmoil as its Shabab militant group has continued the exponential harassment of local populations “to turn Somalia into a seventh-century-style Islamic state.”

What was extremely troubling, however, was “the American military providing intelligence and logistical support” for the Somali government. Although Shabab is working closely with Al Qaeda, America has yet to learn anything from blowback. Al Qaeda’s operations in Somalia are aimed to target the Somali government and have nothing to do with the security of the United States. Furthermore, Shabab and Al Qaeda’s strive to gain a foothold in Somalia are slowly failing, not because of American interventionism, but because of what the NY Times reported to be the populace “now whispering valuable secrets about the Shaba’s movements into the ears of government soldiers.” Additionally, “defectors are leaving the Shabab in droves,” while the “young men joined the local militia” to fend off Shabab fighters. 

Evidently, Somalia is able to fend for itself.


Read more here
Matt Ciepielowski's picture
By Matt Ciepielowski at 8:55PM

The Face of Aid in Haiti

Carel Pedre, a DJ from Haiti, captured this video of heavily armed UN troops overseeing food distribution in Port-au-Prince.

Reuters later reported that troops fired tear gas at the crowd.

Not the warm and fuzzy image of foreign aid portrayed on TV, is it?

Matt Ciepielowski's picture
By Matt Ciepielowski at 7:05PM

Why is Haiti so poor?

Newsweek posted an interesting interview with Michele Wuker of the World Policy Institute about the reasons for Haiti's crushing poverty. She mentions US military intervention, along with farm subsidies and food aid, as being a big part of the problem. She said of Haiti's devastated agriculture industry:

As for Haitian farmers competing with U.S. imports, it raises the larger question of how the U.S. subsidizes its farm industry and dumps surplus crops in the form of food aid. This practice has done a lot of damage in Haiti and other developing countries. For Haiti to sustain its own people, it needs to rebuild the roads and infrastructure needed to transport crops internally.

Here's an informative video from the Heritage Foundation on farm subsidies.