Posts in "immigration"

cwaleba's picture
By Colin Albea at 9:00AM

Repeal HB56!

YAL@UAB participates in the protest and discussion surrounding Alabama's controversial new immigration law.

c.moroney's picture
By Christina Moroney at 11:11AM

GOP Message on Border Control Inconsistant and Hypocritical

Image Credit to Michael Stravato for The New York Times

We've heard it all before:  Republicans using fear tactics and racist rhetoric to win public support for harsher border security and immigration laws. With dangerous drug cartel members sneaking over US-Mexican borders to buy guns for the Drug War, Republicans should be ready and willing to stop these gun sales -- so you would think.

As the Obama Administration approved a new rule that would inform the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives of anyone buying more than two automatic firearms in a five day period in the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas, the NRA claimed that the new rule infringed on 2nd Amendment rights of US citizens. 

Republicans quickly scrambled to oppose the rule, since the NRA is a major ally of the GOP base -- not to mention a donor. The House Appropriations Committee blocked the bill Wednesday, as sponsored by Republican Denny Rehberg of Montana.

Yes it's true -- Republicans tend to side with 2nd Amendment rights -- but the GOP needs to clarify its message on immigration and border laws and stick with it. 

Photo Credit to the NYT.

fraietta's picture
By P.L. Fraietta at 10:36AM

Why I Oppose the DREAM Act

The DREAM Act is back in the news today as some have accused the Obama Administration of not executing current immigration policy in favor of the still-pending DREAM Act. For those unfamiliar, the DREAM Act is a proposal that would give illegal immigrants, who came to the United States as children, a chance at legal status if they complete two years of college or military service.

While I am all for providing a path to citizenship and ultimately open border style immigration laws, I do not support this proposal and it is my belief that all liberty-minded people should oppose it as well.

If we look past the question of whether or not illegal immigrants should have a path to citizenship, we can see that this proposal is simply another attempt at government led social engineering. Why make the requirement two years of college or military service? Because it is government's belief that attending college or joining the military molds "better" citizens.


Read more here
Adam Fowler's picture
By Adam Fowler at 4:54PM

Poll: Arizona Immigration Law

Given the controversy over the new Arizona immmigration law and its legal status, I thought it would be interesting to poll visitors to my personal blog on their views of the constitutionality of the law. After posting it, I thought it would also be interesting to know the views of visitors to the YAL blog, especially since immigration is somewhat of a controversial issue even among libertarians.

To take part in the poll or just view the results, click here.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 9:50AM

Jon Stewart and Judge Napolitano on the Constitutionality of Arizona's Immigration Law

It's nice to see Stewart both expecting Napolitano to give commentary and acknowledging his differences from the standard conservative talking points.  Maybe we're getting somewhere...

Adam Fowler's picture
By Adam Fowler at 11:36AM

"Fair" Pay

Some in the media have picked up on the following video clip from the Secretary of Labor claiming that all workers, legal or illegal, have the right to be paid fairly:

Conservatives are in an uproar that she would imply that illegal immigrants have a right to be paid fairly when they are in the country illegally. But somehow lost in this uproar are more fundamental questions. What does "fair" mean? Who gets to decide what "fair" pay is? And, what does it mean for someone to have a right to "fair" pay?


Read more here
Jihan Huq's picture
By Jihan Huq at 7:01AM

Hispanics Abandoning Arizona

i

As Arizona prepares to put into effect its new immigation law, more Hispanics are abandoning the state.

Even though Arizona's fragile economy plays a crucial role in the local exodus of Hispanics, some indications also indicate that the  exodus is also out of fear for the Arizona's controversial immigration law. New anecdotal evidence suggests that both legal and illegal Hispanics are starting to leave.


Read more here
Jeremy Davis's picture
By Jeremy Davis at 4:27PM

The Victims of Illegal Immigration Laws

In browsing around the innumerable stocks of informational insight at LewRockwell.com, I came across an article by libertarian thinker Glenn Jacobs (aka Kane of World Wrestling Entertainment) that really altered my perspective on the whole illegal immigration debate.

His article centers around the argument that in regards to illegal immigration laws such as the ones recently passed in Arizona, one should consider the implications they may have on an individual’s property rights. Governmental abuses of one's property in response to enforcing illegal immigration laws allows the state to dictate to certain individuals and private businesses who they can and cannot hire or associate with and who may access ones private property regardless of the owners wishes.

Jacobs notes that,

While our system of property rights is already imperfect, the current immigration policy leads to even greater infringements on these rights. For example, if one owns property on or near the border, the government may claim the authority to build a fence or a wall on one’s property, and government agents may come and go as they please without the property owner’s permission.


Read more here
Matt Cockerill's picture
By Matt Cockerill at 11:41PM

A baby moratorium for liberty?

Sound silly? For the libertarian, it's about as viable as "border security," argues Gene Callahan. (And to pre-empt the inevitable outraged idiot who will cry foul over Callahan's suggestion that we forceably stop pregnant or 'prospective' mothers from delivering their little tykes -- in what would inevitably involve quite brusque forms of coercion -- let me note that this is a satirical piece.)

They're Coming To America

Many libertarians have been far too complacent in the face of a growing threat to our cultural cohesion, our way of life, and our liberty. I'm talking, of course, about the thousands of people who arrive in our country everyday, hoping to make it their new home.

Those arrivals present us with a myriad of social problems. For the most part, they do not speak our language. They are unfamiliar with our culture. It will take time to assimilate them all, and the government's effort to promote multi-culturalism through the public schools and other government institutions can only lengthen that assimilation time.

Few of these strangers arrive in America with job offers in hand. The odds are high that many of them will rely, at some point in their lives, on government handouts. And studies show that the longer new arrivals reside in the country, the more likely they are to receive welfare.

They will make use of public transportation, public roads, public utilities, public schools, and so on, further straining resources that are already stretched thin in many cases. Their arrival results in a "dumbing down" of the public education system, prompting politicians to throw even more money at it.


Read more here
Wes Messamore's picture
By Wesley Messamore at 12:09PM

Conservatives Should Support Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants

Think of it this way: as classical liberals, we understand that a bureaucrat in Washington could not possibly have enough information to correctly regulate the price or quantity of a good or service. This applies to labor markets, and immigration is essentially a function thereof. There's no way Washington or the state of Arizona can know how much immigration we really need.

Only the free and voluntary interaction of people and enterprises in an unfettered market will result in the "right" amount of immigration to our country (that is to say- the amount which will result in maximum productivity and value for all parties involved). I actually believe however, that we are seeing more immigration than a free market would produce because of other policies that create market distortions.

So to completely leave the matter up to the marketplace, we need to grant amnesty, end quotas and limits on immigration, and end the nightmarish bureaucratic processes for getting into the country. But we also need to stop allowing non-citizens to take advantage of Federal and state entitlements (frankly we need to stop citizens from doing so too), and we need to stop fixing the price of labor so artificially high, which encourages businesses to hire market-priced labor on the black market (i.e. "illegal" immigrants who are willing to violate the government-enforced cartel on labor)- e.g. end minimum wage and legally-required employment benefits.

Why amnesty?


Read more here