A Case against the NEA
The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) was established in 1965 by President Lyndon Johnson and is hailed by liberals for promoting necessary art in America; when conservatives propose cutting it from the budget, all hell breaks loose. But the NEA should be one of the easiest things to cut! There is absolutely no reason the government should be involved in the arts. I took a closer look at the NEA and what I found absolutely reiterated my assertion: Cut it all.
First, the NEA promotes art that supports the state. In a controversial conference call from 2009 between NEA and White House officials, independent artists, and the Corporation for National and Community Service, there was a clear agenda for the arts: Support Barack Obama. Russell Simmons' political director, Michael Skolnick, was quoted during the conference call claiming that the “White House and folks in the NEA” asked him to “bring together the independent artists community around the country” for that meeting. Why? Because of “the role [they] played during the campaign for the president and also during his first 200 some days” in office. Obama certainly is not the only president to do this but is the most recent.
Read more here

















Social Networks for YAL