Posts in "Government"

Wes Messamore's picture
By Wesley Messamore at 4:32PM

One Little Change

There is just one little change you can make to the language you use in discussing politics, history, and current events that will dramatically improve the precision of your thought, the clarity of your communication, and the effectiveness of your message. That one little change is to stop saying "we" or "America" when you really mean "Washington DC."

For example: It is inaccurate -- or at best, imprecise -- to say "We armed, trained, and funded the Taliban as a proxy against the Soviet Union during the Cold War," or "America's sanctions on Iraq have resulted in the starvation of thousands of Iraqi children."

In both instances, it would be better to say "Washington armed, trained, and funded the Taliban as a proxy against the Soviet Union during the Cold War," and "Washington's sanctions on Iraq have resulted in the starvation of thousands of Iraqi children."

The first formulation of these statements is vague and inaccurate. If someone put it that way to me, I would retort with "Oh really? We did that? I don't remember ever funding the Taliban." Clarity of thought, precise language, and meaningful assertions are so rare in political discourse, and often just a healthy dose of clarity and preciseness is all that is really needed to help someone understand an issue well enough to adopt the correct position on that issue.


Read more here
AndrewWSharp's picture
By Andrew Sharp at 11:04AM

Congratulations to Belgium!

Today, Belgium broke the world record for longest time without a central government.  

What's even better is that the Belgian people have arguably benefitted tremendously from living without the yoke of a central government for the last 249 days.  A blogger at DirectDemocracyUK.com notes that, as Belgians look to regional governments to take over functions previously administered by the national government, they are realizing the benefits of decentralization.

Although many students in Belgium are protesting the government's inaction by staging a striptease (showing that Flemish and Walloon students have the same bodies, and thus should not be "separated"), this writer would encourage them to enjoy not only the achieving of a much enviable world record (we should be so lucky!), but also the creative possibility of restructuring their nation on less-centralized grounds.

KJ Herr's picture
By KJ Herr at 5:44AM

What do the government and Miley Cyrus have in common?

What do the government and Miley Cyrus have in common? Apparently they both cannot be tamed. Miley Cyrus just released a new music video for her song “Can’t Be Tamed.” Throughout the video Ms. Cyrus is referring to how nobody can hold her back and she’s going to do whatever she wants. It makes me think of Congress.

No matter how many times we tell Congress that we do not want socialized healthcare; we do not want a financial regulation overall; we do not want an education reform bill; they continue to do it anyway. Congress can simply not be tamed. There is no cage big enough to hold Congress in. With the national debt reaching $13 trillion I have to wonder how ridiculous do you have to be to get elected into Congress.

Ever since I was little my father taught me the importance of saving and spending wisely. When I was 13 years old I broke one of my dad’s tools. My dad made me buy him a new one, except for I bought in on “credit.” My dad paid for it, but I had to pay him back with $1 interest every month. I realize that’s not very much money but it was the principle of the matter. I did not believe my dad would do that to me at first so I did not bother to pay it back...until after the first month my dad let me know that I owed him $51. I paid that tool off the next month including the interest and did not wait another month. I was tamed when I was 13 years old. Sen. Byrd is 92 years old and I do not think he gets it yet.

This is all to say that maybe Miley would make a pretty good Congresswoman.

Seth Mann's picture
By Seth Mann at 5:17PM

Hating the Government Finally Goes Mainstream

From the Washington Examiner:

By: Chris Stirewalt
Political Editor
April 15, 2010

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 7:58AM

Wake YAL Talks about the Fed and Kittens

I gave a talk at the April 8 meeting of Wake YAL on the Federal Reserve entitled "A Case Against the Federal Reserve," of which the video is posted below.  My goal was to simply lay out two base arguments against the Federal Reserve -- that it is a root cause of the disastrous boom-bust cycle, and that it is antithetical to freedom.  I finished up the talk with a brief question and answer session.  I definitely am a writer, and not a public speaker, so please excuse my natural goofiness and erratic train of thought.  I've divided the talk up into three short parts for convenience's sake.

Part 1 - Origins of the Fed, Boom-Bust Cycle: 


Read more here
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 9:28PM

Logic vs. Government

My latest column at the Daily Caller analyzes the logical fallacies contained in base progressive thought, using Jon Stewart's recent critique of libertarians as a perfect example of an illogical progressive argument, and then applies this analysis to the recent healthcare bill.

...An analysis of the history of government reveals that even government actions with good intent usually end up resulting in negative consequences. Just consider the governmental policies over the past 50 years intended to make home ownership affordable for all Americans. Such actions led directly to an economic collapse that specifically hit the housing market, and thus homeowners, like never before...

...With this view of logic in mind, one can now understand why libertarians are so upset with the recent health care reform. The government-minded leftist would argue that those against the reform do not think that everyone should have access to quality health care, or were content with the current system. Neither is true, and it is in fact often the libertarian’s desire to see affordable health care for as many as possible that drives the protests of Obamacare...

Read the rest here.

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 9:53PM

Kevin Carson: The Founders Were Extremists

And they were right.  Carson comments on the fact that questioning the government, a concept that is simply unbelievable to many in our day in age, is the very principle upon which our country was founded.  He writes:

...Today I heard Bart Stupak, referring to Michelle Bachmann’s allusion to Jefferson (“it’s a good thing to have a revolution every twenty years or so”), respond that we just had one in the last election.  In this country, he said, we have our revolutions through the electoral process.  “That’s what Jefferson meant by that quote,” he said.  Um, no, it wasn’t.  What Jefferson meant was the kind of revolution that Captain Shays was fighting in western Massachusetts at the time he wrote...

...As the anarchist Voltarine DeCleyre noted over a century ago, from the public schools’ accounts of the American Revolution you’d have difficulty understanding why it was even called a revolution, as opposed to just a patriotic foreign war against another country...


Read more here
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 11:55AM

So now you're mad at the government?

My column this week at the Daily Caller is a challenge to moderates and moderate conservatives to see that the recent government actions on healthcare are really just one more action in a pattern of government being far too involved in our economy and our lives.

...It seems to me that such (anti-healthcare) protests are fueled by anger at the government for getting involved where they do not belong and passing legislation that could have dire consequences for both our freedom and our economy.

Not to be smug, but I have to ask the obvious question—is this anything new? Firstly, government-led destruction of our health care system has been going on for decades. Obamacare is simply the latest in a pattern of government claiming to solve problems while merely creating new ones and exacerbating old ones. However, health care is far from the only arena where this takes place.


Read more here
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 7:19PM

The Delusion of Modern Liberals

There’s an old saying about the definition of a liberal, as opposed to a radical:  a liberal is someone who thinks the system is broken and needs to be fixed, whereas a radical understands it’s working the way it’s supposed to ... A liberal who doesn’t think the system is working, doesn’t understand what it’s supposed to do.

So writes Kevin Carson in his recent piece at the Center for a Stateless Society on why people who play by the rules in American society rarely end up reaping the full benefits of their actions.  

While I know that not everyone at YAL agrees with many of the tenants of C4SS, I find great value in this organization as a bridge for the liberty movement to the standard "left" side of the political spectrum.  We need to be drawing people to libertarianism from all sides of the political spectrum, and one great way to draw in sincere leftists is to show them that the welfare/warfare state in which they have put their faith is in fact the originator of most of the societal ills that they wish to correct.


Read more here
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 5:42AM

Federal Government and the Link to Poverty

My latest column at The Daily Caller talks about the negative effects that the federal government's policies, past and present, have on the poorest members of American society:

...I would like to draw attention to the fact that while government loots the rich through the direct means of taxation, it likewise loots the poor, albeit through a different set of means that is much more difficult to recognize, and thus much more difficult to counteract...

...Those of the small-government mindset who wish to rally more people to their cause should not go about proclaiming that we should be immediately getting rid of affirmative action and welfare for the poor, but instead should be putting forth a rallying cry against corporate welfare, an inflation-minded Federal Reserve System, and a law enforcement system whose economic penalties weigh heaviest on those with the least money in their savings accounts. It does not have to be out of selfishness that we advocate for a reduction of the federal nanny-state.  It can, and should, instead be out of a concern for the poverty and destruction of wealth that is directly generated by this institution’s misguided policies.


Read more here