Posts in "Freedom of Speech"

mrbasil0's picture
By Kenny Tan at 6:05PM

The State of Student Rights at Vanderbilt

image

YAL Vandy is proud to announce our next speaker event: "The State of Student Rights at Vanderbilt."

On Wednesday, February 23rd, Adam Kissel, Vice President of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education will be speaking on the "State of Student Rights at Vanderbilt." The topics that will be addressed include Vanderbilt's over-broad definition of hazing, the Community Creed's obligation to be civil and caring, an over-broad definition of sexual harassment, and restrictive reservation policies.

All students, faculty, and administration are encouraged to attend this informative event as it will serve as the first step toward reforming Vanderbilt's policies.

AndrewWSharp's picture
By Andrew Sharp at 5:40PM

YALer Matt Schmitto on Wikileaks and Internet Freedom

Matt Schmitto, President of the  Texas State University San Marcos Chapter of YAL, was quoted in The Prairie about Wikileaks and the coming attacks on internet freedom:

Matthew Schmitto, a member of the group Young Americans for Liberty, said he feels Wikileaks has not violated the Constitution because its founder, Julian Assange, is not an American.

“I don’t think Wikileaks is bound by our Constitution,” he said. “[They] owe no loyalty or anything else to the United States. If anything we should be thanking them for showing us [what] our government is using our tax money towards.”

....Schmitto said he foresees regulations against the Internet taking place. He expects fewer attempts to control freedom of the press.

“I definitely think that the government will continue to gather new regulations on the Internet in the future in an attempt to prevent something of this nature from happening again,” he said.

Schmitto said that U.S. government is already planning restrictions to pass into law.

“I think Wikileaks is going to dramatically affect the freedom of the Internet,” he said. “Senators and Congressmen have already begun writing up new legislation that will provide immense amounts of regulations in effect jeopardizing the freedom of the Internet that we are used to.”

Read the full article here.

Zak Slayback's picture
By Zak Slayback at 12:31PM

Obscenity vs. Freedom: All Charges Dropped! ...for Now

As a very quick and unanticipated follow up to my post on Obscenity vs. Freedom, pertaining to the John Stagliano case and the greater issue of Obscenity and Freedom of Expression; the charges against John Stagliano, numbering so greatly that he could have been put behind bars for up to 32 years for a non-violent "crime" of obscenity, have been dropped.

The Honorable Judge Richard Leon dismissed the charges after the prosecution rested and the defense requested the case be dismissed on lack of evidence. Leon did so.

Reason TV caught up to Mr. Stagliano outside the federal courthouse shortly after the hearing.

Zak Slayback's picture
By Zak Slayback at 7:09AM

Obscenity vs. Freedom

Reason.tv takes a beautiful look at the ensuing obscenity battle, or as the statists like to put it, "porn war," being fought in our nation's court systems.

Note how Mr. Trueman says that what is important isn't rights themselves, but what the courts say are rights. Statists love judicial activism!

Note: Viewer discretion is advised.

Kudos to Reason.tv.

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 8:06PM

New Article at the Daily Caller on Humanitarianism

I have a new article up at the DC about how freedom of communication is an essential force behind humanitarianism, and must be maintained in order for genuine aid to parts of the world that are in poverty to continue and increase.  I argue that the rise of easily accessible mass communication is pushing human society back to a dynamic that holds us accountable for our actions before others, a dynamic that existed for most of human history but was destroyed by the rise of modern society.  I write:

...Civilization took away the natural mechanism of keeping human beings in check; the ability to witness the actions of the other members of the group.    In the tribal community, if one robbed from another, it was rather hard to cover one’s tracks, and one almost definitely ended up paying the consequences.  In modern society, if one steals from another, cuts in front of another in traffic, or commits violence against another, the only way, until recently, that one could be found and punished for one’s actions was if the offender was someone both known and then found by the offended.

Mass media and mass communication are pushing modern society back towards the tribal dynamics of accountability.  Thus, it is not human nature that is changing to a more positive form, but rather society than is changing to better keep human nature in check...

Read the whole article here.

Roy Antoun's picture
By Roy Antoun at 7:09AM

Just a Question or Two...

Stuart BowenOn Tuesday night I paid a visit to 1333 H Street here in Washington, DC for what I thought would be an interesting debate over reconstruction issues in Iraq, an event held by the National Security Network.

Inspector General Stuart Bowen was present and delivered an interesting opening statement laying out his plans for fixing bureaucracy and reconstruction efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. He spoke proudly of the $53 Billion (of our tax dollars) that is being spent on reconstruction and the efforts the United States puts in “protecting its interests abroad.”

Why does the United States need interests abroad? It seems as if Mr. Bowen, a residue of the Bush Administration, is only promulgating a message of perpetual war, especially when he laid out his plans for reconstruction. 


Read more here
Peter St.Jean's picture
By Peter St.Jean at 10:48AM

Thought Crimes and Hate Speech

With a Democrat majority in the House and Senate, and Obama in the White House, the liberals figure it's time to just go nuts "for the children."  To that end they have introduced two bills recently, both named after dead children.  This seems to me to be in extremely poor taste, but apparently using dead children to create a logic-proof shield for your agenda is even more effective than using dead soldiers.

The "Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act" and the "Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act" have a great deal in common, aside from their indelicate exploitation of the deceased.  These acts both violate the 14th Amendment, which guarantees "the equal protection of the laws" to all citizens.  They also violate the 1st Amendment, by controlling speech deemed by the authorities to be "hate" speech, or speech "with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person."

That's right.  If this legislation passes, hurting someone's feelings will be a federal crime, punishable by up to 2 years in prison, a fine, or both.  Give me a break.

Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act (H.R. 1966)
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act (H.R. 1913, S. 909, S. Amdt. 1511)


Read more here