Posts in "Fourth Amendment"

ndirish0310's picture
By Kristian Moriarty at 1:57PM

Kidnap of the Fourth Amendment

The Fourth Amendment is dying and we’re all the murderers, according to 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals Chief Justice Alex Kozinski and his law clerk Stephanie Grace. In an article for TheDaily.com titled “Pulling Plug on Privacy; How Technology Helped Make Privacy Obsolete,” Kozinski and Grace eulogize the Fourth Amendment, recognizing the diminished expectation of privacy that every American has today.

With the increased use of smart phones that track our GPS location at every moment, police no longer need a warrant to track your everyday movements. In a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, individuals who communicate information to another person no longer have an expectation of privacy regarding that information (United States v. White, 1971). It is by this logic that government agencies are able to obtain information about your everyday movements without a warrant. The agencies argue that since you have sent that data via your smartphone to your cell phone provider, they do not need a warrant to obtain that information from your cell phone provider.

The problem with this logic is that most people reasonably believe that they are not subject to being tracked by the government simply because they own a smartphone.


Read more here
JohnMcKenna's picture
By John McKenna at 5:25PM

Warrantless GPS Tracking On Trial

image Despite the unfortunate reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act by Congress last month, provisions of the law, especially with regards to warrantless searches, are being challenged in the courts. This week, the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on the constitutionality of bugging somebody's car with a GPS tracking device without a proper search warrant, which some believe is a flagrant violation of the 4th Amendment.

The case in question revolves around Antoine Jones, who was convicted in 2008 for possession and distribution of cocaine. Mr. Jones' argument is that the evidence presented in his trial was illegally gotten from a GPS tracking device secretly mounted on his Jeep for a month leading up to his arrest. Therefore, the evidence cannot be considered admissible because it was acquired without a search warrant being filed.

Last year, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Mr. Jones' favor, stating that the tracking is a violation of the 4th amendment, yet the government maintains that the warrantless GPS tracking is in compliance with previous court rulings regarding searches. As the case goes before the Supreme Court, civil rights groups like the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) have filed amicus briefs, claiming the new modern tracking style is "highly intrusive" and needs to be restrained.  More at www.silverunderground.com.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 1:44PM

Supreme Court Ignores 4th Amendment, OKs Some Warrantless Searches

The Supreme Court by an 8-1 vote Monday bolstered police authority to break down a door and seize drugs or other evidence of wrongdoing if officers believe it is being destroyed.

The majority upheld the forced, warrantless entry of a Lexington, Ky., apartment that occurred after police, chasing a suspected drug dealer into a breezeway, focused on an apartment unit because of the smell of marijuana and noises coming from inside. Officers kicked in the door, saying later they believed people were trying to get rid of evidence.

Only Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, asserting that the majority “today arms the police with a way routinely to dishonor the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement in drug cases.”

Ginsburg isn't usually the most liberty-friendly justice, but good for her on this one.

 

AndrewWSharp's picture
By Andrew Sharp at 10:52AM

A Victory for TSA resistors

Usually news involving the TSA is dismal: kids being groped, old ladies being felt up, that sort of thing.

Well, today we have some good news in the fight to maintain dignity and privacy in travel: a Seattle man who was arrested for refusing to show his ID at a TSA checkpoint at the Albuquerque Airport, and for video taping the incident, has won his case in court:


Read more here
Zak Slayback's picture
By Zak Slayback at 7:18AM

Security Theatre -- December 31

A family flying out of Hawaii has decided to dress up in their bikinis in order to get through security without being sexually hara....er....security-ized. 

A snippet:

Notes taped to their skin read, "People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security, deserve neither, and will lose both - Ben Franklin""My mommy says Don't talk to strangers, and certainly, don't let anyone fondle me"; and "Didn't the Catholic church get into trouble for this?".

Well, at least this is only the first time this has happened...right?

Er...nevermind. 

Zak Slayback's picture
By Zak Slayback at 3:05PM

A Little Post-Christmas Humor

This version of "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" is said to have been sung at a Carter Administration Justice Department Christmas party sometime in the late 1970's. 

Enjoy.

You’d better watch out,
You’d better not cry,
You’d better not pout;
I’m telling you why.
Santa Claus is tapping
Your phone.

He’s bugging your room,
He’s reading your mail,
He’s keeping a file
And running a tail.
Santa Claus is tapping
Your phone.


Read more here
Adam Fowler's picture
By Adam Fowler at 8:38PM

Hypocrisy in TSA Debate

The controversy over the TSA's new tactics in screening airline passengers has put the same progressives who were against the violation of civil liberties during the Bush administration into somewhat of a dilemma: Criticize the administration for its invasive pat down and scanning procedures or support it as necessary and look like hypocrites. The latter seems to be the tact most taken.

imageThis has led more 'progressive' figures like MSNBC's Chris Matthews and Ed Shultz to support the clear violation of the Fourth Amendment in the name of security. Matthews suggested that the Obama administration had no choice but to implement these measures, because if there were to be another terrorist attack, they would be blamed for not keeping Americans sufficiently safe. Shultz expressed on air the confusing position that resorting to profiling was "trading liberty for security," but the invasive pat downs are justified because only around two percent of Americans are having to endure it. He even stated it was OK because counter-terrorism experts say it is necessary.


Read more here
Shaun Bowen's picture
By Shaun Bowen at 6:26PM

Michian to Use Failed Drug Kits to Arrest Patients

Recently, Michigan joined the list of states that offer medicinal marijuana as an alternative treatment for a varitey of conditions. This did not sit well with one of their leading prohibitionists, Rep. Rick Jones. So, doing what he can to stifle its use, Jones has introduced a new policy for Michigan police forces:  roadside drug tests to enforce the state's drugged driving laws, a process that used to take a warrant.  However, there are a couple of problems with these tests, as shown in this video put out by the Marijuana Policy Project last year:

Of course we should be wary of those who choose to drive under the influence. But given the combination of these inaccurate testing products and the fact that marijuana stays in your system for up to a month after ingesting, this is just going to be another way to lock up pain patients who are not violating any state law.
Alex Kharam's picture
By Alex Kharam at 7:01PM

2010 is off to a rough start...

search

It is a sad thing to wake up after a fun New Years party, go to Drudge Report, and have the first headline be "In with a search:  2010 USA."  It seems American citizens can't go on public lands with out being searched...or at least, not to Times Square on New Years Eve:

Thousands of police officers were deployed in and around Times Square, backed by undercover officers, surveillance cameras, rooftop snipers, and devices able to detect radiation or biological agents.


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 11:37AM

The FBI is stalking you...even though the DHS told them not to.

Newly declassified information has revealed some concerning activity on the part of the FBI:

A fast-growing FBI data-mining system billed as a tool for hunting terrorists is being used in hacker and domestic criminal investigations, and now contains tens of thousands of records from private corporate databases, including car-rental companies, large hotel chains and at least one national department store...

imageIn other words, the FBI is keeping track of a lot of information about private citizens and obtaining it without warrants.   Moreover, the Bureau wants to quadruple the staff of the tracking program to allow them to better keep an eye on all the terrorists this is supposedly going to catch.

The best part of this story is that even the Department of Homeland Security has said (albeit about a different specific program, but it's basically the same thing) data mining for terrorists is an ineffective plan which could lead to violations of privacy -- yes, that DHS, the one which runs the TSA, or airport security.  And if those guys are concerned about privacy violation, this data mining stuff must be bad...I thought that's what the Fourth Amendment was supposed to be for?