Murray N. Rothbard is probably my favorite philosopher and economist -- I have adopted wholesale his natural rights/deontological libertarianism, and his application of this ideology to war and punishment theory. I have fallen in love with the writing of his favorite author, H.L. Mencken. Even on those issues I disagree with Rothbard on -- such as abortion, immigration, and children's rights -- I have to admit that he makes extremely strong cases.
But in my opinion, MNR's view on Fractional Reserve Banking is uncharacterically poorly thought out. While I certainly join him in calling for the abolition of that monster we call the Federal Reserve, Rothbard believed that Fractional Reserve Banking was inherently illicit and would be outlawed in the free society. He argued that since a bank in such a system does not actually have all the money it is storing and lending out, it is engaging in "fraud."
It certainly is criminal for the state to outlaw any competition with the money its Federal Reserve controls the supply of. Because we must accept the Fed and Fractional Reserve Banking, this enables them to do all sorts of evil things, to include the ability to create endless money to fund wars, pay back debts, and print their own budget. Surely, a "gold standard" or some sort of Full Reserve Banking, would be far preferable to Fractional Reserve Banking. This would at least limit the amount of money they could produce.
Read more here
Social Networks for YAL