Posts in "Federal Reserve"

Julie Borowski's picture
By Julie Borowski at 10:53AM

The Fed's Increased Efforts to Hide Bailout Records

On Friday, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke gave a speech claiming that the economy is finally headed on the right track. He stated at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s annual economic symposium that "despite this recent slowing, however, it is reasonable to expect some pickup in growth in 2011 and in subsequent years."

Not so fast. It has become apparent that Ben Bernanke’s economic forecasts are rarely ever correct. Here are just a few quotes showing Ben Bernanke’s oblivion to the looming housing crisis from 2005 to 2007:

CNBC announcer Maria Bartiromo, July 2005: We have so many economists coming on our air and saying oh this is a [housing] bubble and it’s going to burst and this is going to be a real issue for the economy. Some say it could even create a recession at some point. What is the worst case scenario?

Ben Bernanke: I guess I don’t buy your premise. It’s a pretty unlikely possibility… I don’t think it’s going to drive the economy too far from its full employment path though…I’m hopeful and I’m confident in fact that the bank regulators will pay close attention to the kind of loans that are being made and making sure underwriting is done right.


Read more here
Megan Duffield's picture
By Megan Duffield at 9:21PM
Joseph Gauthier's picture
By Joseph Gauthier at 6:38PM

Quantitative Easing, Version 2.0

Per the FOMC announcement:

To help support the economic recovery in a context of price stability, the Committee will keep constant the Federal Reserve's holdings of securities at their current level by reinvesting principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities. The Committee will continue to roll over the Federal Reserve's holdings of Treasury securities as they mature.

Here, we see an attempt by the Federal Reserve to prevent price deflation. Whether or not you believe price deflation will occur (I would wager that the readers of this website tend to view price inflation as the likely outcome), this particular move is inflationary as the Federal Reserve has not committed to reducing the size of its balance sheet.

Many intelligent people (e.g., Mish) are forecasting that price deflation will occur in the short-term. I tend to agree with Mish (in regards to the short-term). As noted in one of the Mises Daily articles for today:

After the crisis arrives and the depression begins, various secondary developments often occur. In particular, for reasons that will be discussed further below, the crisis is often marked not only by a halt to credit expansion, but by an actual deflation — a contraction in the supply of money. The deflation causes a further decline in prices. Any increase in the demand for money will speed up adjustment to the lower prices. Furthermore, when deflation takes place first on the loan market, i.e., as credit contraction by the banks — and this is almost always the case — this will have the beneficial effect of speeding up the depression-adjustment process.

The above quotation is courtesy of Murray Rothbard's book: Man, Economy, & State.


Read more here
Megan Duffield's picture
By Megan Duffield at 11:39AM

Fed News Friday: The Fed's Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

As last week's Fed News Friday article read, deflation has been the trending topic through the week. The funny part about that is economists and Fed members alone can't decide whether it is the actual threat or not.

The other possibility is the complete opposite:  inflation. The broad range of this argument leaves me wondering, didn't the administration appoint these people for their expertise?

From articles I have seen and previous knowledge of the Fed's behavior, my guess is either economic phenomenon will occur. The only deciding factor is: Which one does the Federal Reserve want to occur?

That's right. The Fed officials know they hold the power to expel their preferred self-fulfilling prophecy. Once they publicly announce which the larger threat is, deflation or inflation, the market and their personal printing press will react accordingly.


Read more here
Megan Duffield's picture
By Megan Duffield at 8:43PM

Oh No...Not...Deflation *GASP*

If you have been article hunting like myself on this fine Fed Friday, you will notice one special word that is floating amidst our sea of information:  deflation.
image
It seems as though the Federal Reserve chairs and board members across the country have their knickers in a bunch over what appears to be one of the biggest threats to the recovering economy. Aside from a few branches (Philly & Kansas City) most Fed members are calling for action to combat what could be a "Japan-like" deflationary trap.
Let's begin here by looking a little bit further into deflation itself...
Deflation is the increase in the value of money which then allows for the prices of goods and services to lower, because your money is worth more. Deflation can happen for many reasons combining supply and demand, however some of the most basic reasons for deflation are the increases in the supply for goods, people saving (hoarding) money, and the contraction of the money supply.

Read more here
Julie Borowski's picture
By Julie Borowski at 6:47PM

Financial “Reform” Bill Expands Power of Fed

The recently passed Dodd-Frank financial services reform bill is yet another example of power-grabbing legislation that fails to address the root causes of the current financial crisis. Countless studies have confirmed that the Federal Reserve played a major role in the fiscal collapse by artificially keeping interest rates low by inflating the money supply in the economy. Before the official recession began in December 2007, the economy appeared to be booming with an expansion of credit. Inevitably, the long period of unsustainable negative real interest rates gave individuals a tempting incentive to borrow from the banking system. Unfortunately, the artificially low interest rate misled millions of people to take out loans that they could not afford to pay back once the interest rates eventually rose.

Government-established central banks tampering with the market provoked the artificial boom followed by the current inescapable bust or crash. Following the boom-bust cycle, true financial reform legislation should seek to examine how the secretive Fed sets its interest rates. Yet, the Dodd-Frank bill grants the Fed significantly more power to oversee financial firms. According to Cato Institute scholar Mark A. Calabria,

The legislation's worst oversight is to ignore completely the role of loose monetary policy in driving the housing bubble.


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 4:41PM

Fiat Currency: Redesigned

StumbleUpon brought me to a page of proposed redesigns for American currency.  I thought a couple of them were worth sharing here:

  • For those who refuse to understand the simplest of Latin mottoes, let's be clear that we're "One Nation from Many People":

    image
  • Here's rich irony -- Lincoln with the Fourth Amendment (I do like the idea of having the Bill of Rights on something so commonly handled as money though.  It would still be a fiat currency, but at least people might be a little more familiar with their rights):

    image
  • Appropriately frivolous -- "It's, like, totally a Federal Reserve Note, OMG":

    image
Joseph Gauthier's picture
By Joseph Gauthier at 8:00AM

The Federal Reserve and Junk-Bonds

Ludwig von Mises once wrote: "Economics, as a branch of the more general theory of human action, deals with all human action, i.e., with man's purposive aiming at the attainment of ends chosen, whatever these ends may be."

Essentially, market participants act in their self-interest. For this reason, I find it hard to believe that the Federal Reserve actually thought the assets it purchased and stored in Maiden Lane would remain investment-grade. After all, if the assets were so valuable, JPMorgan Chase and Co. (JPM) would have kept them for themselves. The fact that JPM was not interested in the assets should have sent a clear message to the Federal Reserve that the assets were not worthwhile.

Instead, as this Bloomberg article points out, the "Fed Made Taxpayers Unwitting Junk-Bonds." According to Bloomberg, "more than 88 percent of Maiden Lane’s CDO [collateralized debt obligation] bonds and 78 percent of its non-agency residential mortgage-backed debt are now speculative grade... as of Jan. 29."


Read more here
Alexander Habighorst's picture
By Alexander Habighorst at 5:06PM

The Bloggers Strike Back

Many of you remember the diatribe passing as an academic paper written by Federal Reserve economist Kartick Athreya.

However, it seems some bloggers are striking back (including here at YAL) as well as the Daily Telegraph's Ambrose Evans-Pritchard who had this to say about the Fed:

Central banks were the ultimate authors of the credit crisis since it is they who set the price of credit too low, throwing the whole incentive structure of the capitalist system out of kilter, and more or less forcing banks to chase yield and engage in destructive behaviour.

The full article is here.

Shaun Bowen's picture
By Shaun Bowen at 7:55AM

Economics is Hard

Many of you, I'm sure, are fascinated by economic theory. Whether it's from the Austrian School, Chicago School, or even Marxist thought, we in the liberty movement tend to take economics very seriously and our predictions, theories, and discussions do not come lightly.

But in case you thought your studies and writings meant something, I'm sorry -- but you're wrong.

...at least according to the newest working study put out by the Federal Reserve of Richmond. In a paper titled "Economics is Hard. Don’t Let Bloggers Tell You Otherwise," (and no I'm not kidding), Fed Economist Kartik Athreya with a hubris that should make even the most ardent narcissist blush declares -- basically -- that THE FED IS GOD AND ANY OTHER IDEAS ARE JUST POPPYCOCK. Check it out here at Zero Hedge.com and please try not to spit your drink on your screen and ruin your monitor.

Or maybe thats the Fed's new stimulus plan?

The best part is at the bottom, where he states that a study, being paid for by the Fed does "...not necessarily represent those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,or Federal Reserve System." They just thought it would be fun to spend our funny money on it.