Posts in "fannie mae"

JohnMcKenna's picture
By John McKenna at 1:00PM

Fannie Mae Needs More of Your Money

imageFannie Mae, one of the federal government's big mortgage lending outfits, stated today that it needs more taxpayer-funded bailouts to stay afloat. The mortgage giant, still recovering from its tailspin three years ago due to the real estate crash and subsequent seizure by the federal government, has reported three straight quarters of multi-billion dollar losses, and now needs $5.1 billion in stimulus to meet its loan obligations.

Since 2008, Fannie Mae has needed $104 billion in government stimulus to keep itself going, and has only been able to pay back a meager $14.7 billion of it. This is the same partially government-owned company that during the housing boom artificially held interest rates down, and made huge, low-interest loans to customers who had no business getting them. They also participated in the same credit-default swaps that triggered one of the worst economic downturns in a century, and became completely nationalized because of it, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for its bad business practices.

As the old saying goes, if it moves, tax it; if it's dead, nationalize it. Fannie is clearly dead, yet we still have to give it money to continue going about its business of making housing loans in a market that is getting worse by the day.

Originally posted at www.silverunderground.com.

Ryan Gilroy's picture
By Ryan Gilroy at 6:31AM

More Money, More Loans, More Time

I don't  know who this author of this story is or anything about his ideological leanings, but the headline alone should give anyone pause.  Something is definitely wrong when people seriously recommend manipulating the market and giving a failing enterprise more money, loans, and time will fix everything.

Ryan Gilroy's picture
By Ryan Gilroy at 10:33AM

Vampires are Back

No  popular culture references here:  Fannie Mae is back in the news, this time sucking the blood from our economy with $72,000,000,0000 -- and yes that is $72 billion -- in losses for 2009.  Not surprisingly, the government-created company is asking the Treasury Department for yet more billions to keep their public/private partnership afloat.

Brian Beyer's picture
By Brian Beyer at 6:49PM

Capitalism is Dead.

image

But Corporatism is doing just fine. Here is a chart of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after it was announced that they would essentially receive a "blank check" from the US taxpayer. 

Peter St.Jean's picture
By Peter St.Jean at 6:36AM

The Mortgage Mess

Here's a story that's not receiving a lot of coverage thus far, but really brings home what a mess the housing crisis really is.

Supposedly, when you buy a home the bank lends you money up front and agrees to be paid back gradually, with interest.  A simple, straightforward relationship. But as we all now know, lenders in the past decade or so have been securitizing their mortgages.  This means that the bank doesn't really own your mortgage.  Instead, mortgages are tossed into a pool and then sold to many different buyers.  So a piece of your mortgage is owned by a businessman in Taiwan, another by a retiree in Kansas, and so on. As the New York Times reports:

During the mortgage lending spree ... home loans changed hands constantly. Those that ended up packaged inside of mortgage pools, for instance, were often involved in a dizzying series of transactions.

To avoid the costs and complexity of tracking all these exchanges, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the mortgage industry set up MERS to record loan assignments electronically.


Read more here
Joseph Gauthier's picture
By John Galt at 9:03PM

Fannie Mae Asks Government for Additional $10.7 Billion

Question:
What lender would choose to loan their client additional capital after its regulator says the debtor will be unable to pay it back?

Answer:
The United States Government.

Last week, James Lockhart, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said "it's hard for me to see that [Fannie Mae] will be able to repay all of that." After all, "their book is so large." According to the Washington Post, "Lockhart's comments were a blunt acknowledgment that while the government has long said its bailout of the financial sector largely represents an investment that will be repaid, billions of dollars are likely to be lost."


Read more here
Zachary Kurtz's picture
By Zachary Kurtz at 7:55PM

Why did Fannie and Freddie fail?

Brad Delong on Cato Unbound claims that demand shifted to private mortgage lenders, so that Fannie and Freddie's excessively risky loans weren't the primary reason why the two lenders failed. I'm not sure if I buy this argument.  First of all, F&F may have lost 10% of their market share, but the risky borrowers where still getting their subprime loans from private lender.  So the subprime collapse, which F&F where a part of, was still probably a result of the CRA a
Read more here