Posts in "Economics"

Creighton Harrington's picture
By Creighton Harrington at 10:23AM

Sounds like a great idea...with the best of intentions.

But, as the old adage goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.  Good video from Reason:

Posted in:
Dan John's picture
By Dan John at 6:07PM

The Two-Headed Leviathan

A gigantic monster has taken over our country, a two-headed sovereign that controls our federal, local, and state governments. This two-headed creature, which has one head of a donkey and the other of an elephant, has a monopoly of power in the political economy of these United States.

The most simple and well-known fact about the political economy in America is that it is ruled completely by the same two political factions. This widely known fact itself is often overlooked in most political debates. Almost all federal, state, and even local government officials are members of one of these two parties.  Interestingly, the modern day Democratic Party was referred to as the "Democratic-Republican Party" until the late 1820s.

This sovereign's power lies not just within the government itself, but within the barriers of the two-party paradigm. The barriers of this realm go as far "left" as the mainstream left would go, and as far "right" as the mainstream right would go. Ron Paul's truly conservative view on foreign aid, for example, is outside the barriers of both the mainstream right and the mainstream left, leaving it thus outside the barriers of mainstream politics and not eligible for debate.


Read more here
Wes Messamore's picture
By Wesley Messamore at 10:50AM

ObamaCare is like...

Hilarious video reminder of ObamaCare rationing. Economic proof that centrally-planning health insurance will only result in less access and rationed care here.

Matt Cockerill's picture
By Matt Cockerill at 11:39AM

"Mommy, Mommy, I can read! Now fork over that cash so I can buy a Wii."

Americans should be open to radically reforming our country's educational system. The current educational system is failing America's kids. Miserably. In fact, generously funded government school systems in major US  cities have on-time graduation rates below 50%

This should be no surprise. Most kids are, after all, too feisty and "real" to buy into the PC cult-phrase of "we're all the same."  They're thus unlikely to conform to the phoniness, and be excited about learning in the left-statist ant farm of establishment public education.

On the vein of new ideas, good for Harvard Economist Roland Fryer Jr. for conducting a "politically incorrect" and creative educational experiment. Fryer paid schoolchildren to learn, with more money given to more successful students. Fryer's critics have decried his methods as contrary to the spirit of government "education" among other inane things.


Read more here
Matt Ciepielowski's picture
By Matt Ciepielowski at 2:41PM

Milton Friedman on America's Future

In this video, the late Milton Friedman gives his opinion on what path America will take and predicts that a movement may form to combat big government. Perhaps he foresaw the rise of the Tea Parties?

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 7:58AM

Wake YAL Talks about the Fed and Kittens

I gave a talk at the April 8 meeting of Wake YAL on the Federal Reserve entitled "A Case Against the Federal Reserve," of which the video is posted below.  My goal was to simply lay out two base arguments against the Federal Reserve -- that it is a root cause of the disastrous boom-bust cycle, and that it is antithetical to freedom.  I finished up the talk with a brief question and answer session.  I definitely am a writer, and not a public speaker, so please excuse my natural goofiness and erratic train of thought.  I've divided the talk up into three short parts for convenience's sake.

Part 1 - Origins of the Fed, Boom-Bust Cycle: 


Read more here
Roy Antoun's picture
By Roy Antoun at 12:13PM
Brian Beyer's picture
By Brian Beyer at 9:36AM

Central Planning...

...does not work. Despite numerous efforts by the Obama administration to keep the housing market at its bubble level, they have failed. The money has run out. The spigot is dry. 

The S&P/Case Shiller home price indices for January have been on the fall since December. Prices haven't dropped sharply, yet. The only reason for this is the artifical propping up of the housing market that appears to have finally met its match. Scarily enough, however, is how long it will take for prices to correct to the market level

Also, looking at the 1990s-era comparison charts below its obvious that even after the main downward thrust has been reached, the housing markets have a long tough slog ahead with the ultimate bottom likely many years out…. Or if we are currently experiencing the Japanese model… decades out.

Residential real estate aren't the only worries. Commerical real estate enjoyed the same sugar high that the residential real estate market experienced. Now it must suffer through the same hangover. No matter how much greasy food the Obama administration gives commercial real estate, if at all, it will surely be no cure. It looks like the day of reckoning is fast upon us. Commercial real estate bankruptcies rose 52% in 2009. There are no signs that things will get better either.

As always, who have been calling this up and coming bust? The Austrians of course. 

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 5:49PM

Sherry Jarrell

One of the coolest parts about getting to write for Learning from Dogs is working with the interesting people that write there.  One of those people in particular, Sherry Jarrell, might be of interest to those in the YAL community.  Professor Jarrell is Professor of Practice of Finance and Economics in the Calloway School of Business and Accountancy here at Wake Forest University.  Using her vast knowledge of economics and finance, she has written some of the best critiques of recent governmental policies that I have seen at her Web site.  For example, she recently wrote on Federal Reserve policy, saying:

...the process of tightening the money supply may be just around the corner. And increases in interest rates and the cost of everything purchased on credit – homes, cars, durable goods, and business capital expenditures – are not far behind. Increases in interest rates dampen economic activity, an unfortunate development given the current lethargic state of the U.S. economy. But it has to be done sometime – we cannot sustain such a huge increase in the money supply without paying an even higher price in terms of inflation and a weak dollar.

Not only has she put forth interesting commentary, but Jarrell also signed onto a Cato Institute petition back in early 2009 contesting President Obama's claim that economists were united in their support of the stimulus.

“I think this is beyond politics,” she said. “This stimulus package flies in the face of basic economic reality. I commented as an economist, not a politician.”


Read more here
Brian Beyer's picture
By Brian Beyer at 7:30AM

Let's Abolish the Minimum Reserve Requirement

I, along with anyone who adheres to the Austrian School of Economics, would like to completely abolish every regulation in our currently unfree "free market." Not surprisingly, this includes abolishing the Federal Reserve which would ultimately give rise to commodity money (or "hard money"). This is because sans a government decree, no sane person would accept pieces of green paper backed by nothing as "money." They would expect it to be exchangeable for a tangible good, whatever it may be. Throughout most of history, money has been backed by either silver or gold for reasons too numerous to write. Money has also been as unconventional as bottles of water and tobacco.  

Since commodity money is backed by a physical good, it cannot be created out of thin air. This is unlike fiat money which is backed by nothing, enforced through government decree, and can be created out of thin air.

As a result, a minimum reserve requirement in a free society (one with commodity money) is redundant. Banks would more or less serve as a warehouse for people's money. Unhealthy or reckless banks that could not produce its deposits for its consumers would likely go out of business because of increased consumer vigilance. Therefore, it would be both irresponsible and unprofitable, in the long run, to not hold all deposits.


Read more here