Posts in "Conservatism"

cityoflight's picture
By Joe Miller at 3:01PM

Non-intervention: Liberal or conservative?

Is opposition to war and support for a non-interventionist foreign policy a liberal position, or a conservative one?

Look at the historical record and the answer is clear.

The majority of the major conflicts -- both declared and undeclared wars -- of the 20th century have been started by Democratic presidents.  Indeed, President Obama has continued that tradition quite effectively, with undeclared military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Libya during his first term. Granted, he did not originate all of these engagements, but to imply that Obama has been a dovish president is odd, to say the least.

And some remarks from historical conservative figures:

I do not believe any policy which has behind it the threat of military force is justified as part of the basic foreign policy of the United States except to defend the liberty of our own people.   – Robert Taft, “Mr. Republican”


Read more here
bertramt's picture
By Tim Bertram at 7:11AM

Minnesota's Gay Marriage Amendment

Currently the state of Minnesota has a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage on the ballot for next November and it has been making a lot of people very angry.  Naturally, we have been hearing a lot of the GOP and GLTB talking points (and some other weird stuff), but I read this in the Pioneer Press the other day and it got me to think about why conservatives should support legalizing gay marriage:

America is about freedoms... Like you used not to be able to marry somebody of a different race, and that is just ridiculous now.  So I think that its just a matter of time... People will be surprised that it was ever an issue.

This is a quote from a 19-year old resident of Minneapolis who visited the state fair this past week, and I think what she says brings up two very important parts to the gay marriage debate that conservatives need to consider.  

First, "America is about freedoms."  Conservatives see themselves as defenders of freedoms from the left and the government, yet this particular freedom is just a little too much for them.  You cannot pick and choose what freedoms people can and cannot have -- you are either free or not.  I am a firm believer that once you compromise on one part of a freedom, you compromise on 100% of that principle.  The principle here is people having the liberty to free association, and this can be with your employer, organizations, or who you choose to marry.

The second point is that marriage laws have a clear history of being used to limit the rights of minorities, such as Jim Crow laws which prevented interracial marriages.  Likewise, laws which outlaw gay marriage limit the right of free association of the LGBTQ minority.  Conservatives do not want to be remembered 40 years from now as the people that held back the rights of those with a different sexual orientation, just like we look back with shame on those who held back the rights of those with a different skin color.  Moreover, it's always important to remember that if you give the government the right to limit the freedom of a group you don't like, there's no reason to think that same power won't be used against you somewhere down the line.

colombiano972's picture
By Jose Nino at 5:28PM

Libertarianism vs. Conservatism, Round 2

Due to great turnout last year, the Cato Institute will be hosting another debate between libertarians and conservatives

Cato invites you to a thought-provoking debate about the two philosophies and their respective policy applications, as interns from the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute go head-to-head to  answer the age-old question: Which is the better philosophy, libertarianism or conservatism?

You can register right now for this must-see summer event here! The debate will be held on Thursday, July 21st at 6:30 pm with a reception to follow. Chip Bishop of the Cato Institute will give the introduction and the debate will be moderated by David Barnes, Senior Policy Analyst of Economic Policies for the 21st Century.

If you can't make it to the Cato Institute,  this event will be streamed live in the aforementioned links.

Libertarian vs. Conservative

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 11:38AM

A Conservative Proposal for Dealing with the Debt

From the Conservative Action Project comes a set of suggestions for dealing with the staggering $14 trillion national debt:

1. No Tax Increases.

2. The total amount of spending cuts included in any increase to the debt ceiling must at least equal the increase in the debt ceiling.

3. Inclusion of $300 Billion of spending cuts from the recommended options proposed by the House Republican Study Committee Spending Reduction Act of 2011, including Defunding “Obamacare”—officially known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

4. Cap total federal spending at its historical average of 18% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and enforce this with statutory automatic spending sequestration whenever spending exceeds budget levels or the debt exceeds the new limit.

5. A Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) with strong protections against federal tax increases and including a Spending Limitation Amendment (SLA) with statutory, enforceable total spending caps to reduce federal spending.

Read the whole proposal here.  What do you think -- is this enough to stop the debt?  A good start?  Too much?  Give your view in the comments.

Shaun Bowen's picture
By Shaun Bowen at 2:20PM

Have the terrorists won?

As many of you know, groups like Family Research Council, Concerned Women For America, American Values, the American Principles Project, the Capital Research Center, and others are boycotting this year's CPAC event because of the inclusion of GOProud as a partcipant.

But now CPAC is catching criticism for a new reason -- Muslims.  That's right -- the convenient catch-all boogeyman of radical Islam, eager to institute Sharia Law in America and get every woman into a spacesuit, has apparently taken over CPAC.  The terrorists, it seems, have won.  Raw Story reports:

The conservative columnist Frank Gaffney also criticized CPAC for inviting Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist and former Bush staffer Suhail Khan, claiming the two men were part of a Muslim conspiracy to infiltrate the conservative community.


Read more here
James Touhey's picture
By James Touhey at 5:34PM

Study: Are Liberals Smarter Than Conservatives?

image

I write tonight in complete disgust.

What I’m disgusted in is either a huge blunder or a blatant bias in reporting by Time Magazine. To be honest, I am not sure what worries me more -- that no one in 1500 comments and 5000 Facebook 'likes' caught on or that it can slip (or be guided) through the cracks of editing in such a trusted publication.

Take a look below to see if you can spot the egregious error or read below to let me explain:

The notion that liberals are smarter than conservatives is familiar to anyone who has spent time on a college campus. The College Democrats are said to be ugly, smug and intellectual; the College Republicans, pretty, belligerent and dumb. There's enough truth in both stereotypes that the vast majority of college students opt not to join either club.


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 3:20PM
Seth Mann's picture
By Seth Mann at 10:00PM

The Perils of Partisanship

From the Southern Avenger:

Matt Ciepielowski's picture
By Matt Ciepielowski at 12:45PM

Contract from America

The Tea Party Patriots organization released their "Contract from America" at the Tea Party in Washington DC yesterday. There's a good amount of solidly libertarian/fiscally conservative planks in there, and a total absence of any that refer to foreign policy (it's too bad the Audit the Fed plank didn't make it in though). Certainly some of the Tea Partiers don't completely understand the link between big government and the empire abroad, but maybe they are starting to come around.

Here are the ten planks, along with the percentage of votes they received (there was a list of about 20 planks online, and participants voted for their top ten).

1. Protect the Constitution

Require each bill to identify the specific provision of the Constitution that gives Congress the power to do what the bill does. (82.03%)

2. Reject Cap & Trade

Stop costly new regulations that would increase unemployment, raise consumer prices, and weaken the nation’s global competitiveness with virtually no impact on global temperatures. (72.20%)


Read more here
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 8:59AM

Eagles We Were, Eagles We Will Be Again

The following article is a response to Thomas Qualtere of The Heritage Foundation’s recent article “Hawks we are, hawks we must remain,” published on the Web site of The Daily Caller.

I rarely become truly angry when reading the opinion of a fellow human being. As should be obvious from my libertarian associations, I understand that free speech is inextricably linked with freedom. However, while I would never advocate for the silencing of one whose opinion I find little to no common ground with, I can still say that Thomas Qualtere of the Heritage Foundation’s recent article concerning the future of both foreign policy and conservatism in our nation deeply saddens me, and reinforces in my mind the importance of helping my fellow Americans gain an accurate understanding of the misguided foreign policy that has led our country into a cycle of perpetual war and violence from which it often seems there is no escape.

Qualtere attempts to address the question of where the youth of today should commit themselves in terms of creating the American foreign policy of tomorrow.  “We are the 9/11 generation,” he writes.  Qualtere states that we are a generation that should understand the cost of not confronting our enemies overseas, and that the lessons of 9/11 should be our call to fight for an American foreign policy that deals with our enemies where they live, rather than lets them come to strike us at home.


Read more here