The Case for Anthropogenic Climate Change
Many libertarians, including otherwise serious scholars and men of letters, sound like empty-headed dolts when discussing scientific matters. To redress this unfortunate deficiency, I want to talk about Global Warming, a subject scarcely (if ever) raised on pro-liberty websites.
The Greenhouse Effect entails the absorption of solar radiation emitted from the earth's surface via certain "greenhouse gases" (a category comprised of water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone). This absorption of solar radiation heats the earth. Empirical verification of this theory is accessible to all of us; it would be foolish to deny it.
Obviously, then, the heat of the earth will increase in tandem with increased atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Ergo, human emissions of CO2 are contributing to global warming. Period. The scientific debate is over anthropogenic climate change's degree and social import, not over its existence.
Given the logically inescapable nature of my reasoning as presented in the foregoing paragraphs, as well as the fact that the Greenhouse Effect is an empirically-verifiable phenomenon, I think it is singularly silly for people to say man doesn't contribute to this problem (if a problem it be).
Read more here



It's obvious
"You don't have to use that kind of violence to be heard," said Danish Minister Connie Hedegaard, condemning the violence that occured in 










Social Networks for YAL