A libertarian's Case for the Civil War
Before I begin I would like to say that I am not making any moral arguments. I’m not really making any arguments at all. I am simply presenting some ideas I’ve had. I know that libertarians argue that government should only be involved if someone’s natural rights are being infringed upon. That is where I got the original idea for this piece. I’m not here to say that I’m right and you are wrong if you disagree with me; this is just a thought.
Can a libertarian make a good argument for supporting the Civil War? Probably not as it was played out in history. But if there were changes in intent and reasoning, could there been some justification with government involvement? With my arguments, I believe so.
I don’t think that Lincoln was all for bringing freedom to the black slaves of the south. He made many speeches while in Illinois stating that he was not for equality between whites and blacks.
Read more here

In the 21st century, America is haunted by Lincoln's blood lust for a coercive, dominant, unitary, unaccountable, debt-laden central government. That is why this book matters. Abraham Lincoln opened the door to the Leviathan central state that mandates, manipulates, and regulates virtually every aspect of life in America and seeks unilateral hegemony around the globe.












Social Networks for YAL