Sep 6, 2011 at 1:05 PM
(Click on the image for a larger version.)
Oh look, the same countries that pushed for NATO’s war in Libya: Italy, France, the United Kingdom, and the U.S. The very same countries that are now staking claim in Libya’s oil wealth.
Posted in:
- Blog Policy
- Login or register to post comments
Connect with YAL
to the YAL channel on 
Upcoming Events
-
Info This seminar offers an introduction to the thoughts and thinkers of the...
-
Info The contrast between liberty and power in the history of the...
-
Info The summer’s final Freedom University boasts lectures on the hottest...
-
Info This is an all day, family-friendly convention for freedom-minded folks in...
-
Info Taking RSVP now for a June 30th - July 1st convention.We need to secure...
If Obama did it for oil, he didn't do it for Libyan oil - he just did it to make sure the prices of our Canadian and Mexican oil didn't skyrocket.
That alone is not a reason to commit our resources overseas, especially when the result remains ambiguous.
Clearly you are mistaken Jayel my dear friend, force was only committed to ensure the right of Arab Winter to hold up, I mean for humanitarian purposes.
Excellent post.This was actually what I was looking for, and I am glad that I finally came here! Thanks for sharing the such information with us.Thanks for taking this opportunity to discuss this
Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts.