Washington State Devotes $1.32 million to Develop Electric Highway

Eric Sieker's picture
By Eric Sieker at 9:29PM

image

Washington State has recently proposed construction of electric charge stations along the I-5. They are able to do this with a $1.32 million grant from the federal government. The thinking here is that if they build the infrastructure, then people will purchase more electric or hybrid vehicles. That seems to me to be a very broad assumption -- a broad assumption made at the expense of taxpayers.

The fact is that electric cars are still very much a fantasy and are at this point neither practical nor desirable for the average American motorist. However, that is not the main issue here. The issue is that taxpayer money is being wasted on this fantasy.

No one but the small minority of electric drivers could possibly benefit from this proposal. Furthermore, you all might have noticed that this country is in a kind of a… What do you call it? Depression? Yeah that’s right -- we’re in a depression. So how does it make any sense for the government to throw around millions of dollars for a fantasy while there are people struggling to make ends meet? The citizens of this country have bigger and better things to worry about than electric highways at present time.

The stations they propose to construct along the highway are referred to as Level 3 stations. According to the article “The Level 3 stations are the type that can recharge an electric vehicle's battery within 15 to 30 minutes.” My God! These stations are capable of recharging a cars battery in 15 to 30 minutes?! Wow. What a time to be alive. Or you know, you could fill up your car with gasoline in less than 5 minutes. I guess you should choose whichever one makes you feel good, right? And really that’s what all of this is about: Feeling good. Not improving productivity or providing something which will benefit a majority of the people, but just feeling good. That is the prevailing wisdom and it will doom this country to spending even more on feel good fantasies. 

The article mentions that there are still some details to be worked out, “There still are plenty of details to work out, like the exact locations and how consumers would pay for the power.” How will consumers pay for the power? It is an interesting question. However, an even more interesting question is how will the government pay for the technology?  

Let me make it clear that I am in no way trying to disparage the development and evolution of clean technology. However, I do see this particular venture as a total waste of taxpayer money at a time when taxpayers need all the money they can get. Furthermore, who’s to say that these recharging stations are the wave of the future? There are many other technologies out there and I think it’s foolish to gamble with taxpayer money on a technology that is still uncertain. Taxpayers must be vigilante if they truly wish to hold on to their money, especially in the current economic atmosphere.

It’s easy to get carried away when you’re being told that the world is in imminent danger. I’m sure many advocates of electrics and hybrids would accuse me of standing in the way of helping the earth. But I would ask them to cool their jets and remind them that a decision made out of fear never has a positive outcome. If we are to develop a clean, sustainable energy source we must take our time and make sure we are making the correct decisions. Otherwise we may wake up one day to find that we’ve blown all our money because it felt good at the time.

On the bright side, at least we aren't using the money to blow up innocent people in other counries.

Joseph Gauthier's picture

And the next grant will be for building windfarms behind these recharge stations in order to provide the electricity for them!

's picture

Just curious about this sentence of your article:

"The fact is that electric cars are still very much a fantasy and are at this point neither practical nor desirable for the average American motorist"

While I definitely agree government funding for a project like this will not turn out positive (I think anytime government gets involved it almost always makes things worse and this proposed projects seems no different on the surface) I don’t however understand you position on Electric Cars.

The real Facts are several major car companies are coming out with all electric or semi electric plug-in hybrids within the next two years:

Electric cars are very much a viable option.  They are actually far less expensive to own and operate than traditional combustion engines (check the difference in movable parts and ask a mechanic).  Also check the ranges on each of these cars, they all get very good mileage or have reasonable ranges on a charge. 

In reality electric cars have been around since the early 1900's and really are a good option in terms of reducing our use of fossil fuels.  Not meaning to attack you on this issues, I love this site and enjoy many of your articles.  Just curious where you based your belief that electric cars are a fantasy?

's picture

Thanks for your reply. I'm always appreciative of a dissenting opinion. You make an interesting point.Major car companies are making electric cars. However, these cars are not very efficient. They cannot travel long distances, and the battery on the Nissan Leaf for instance takes 20 hours to fully recharge. There is a quick charge available but even that takes 30 minutes and doesn't bring you up to full power. Not to mention if you do in fact use this quick charge method the life of your battery decreases faster than it would otherwise.Also, no one has figured out yet how exactly charging will be taken care of during longer trips.

If I want to save money, buying a car that cost upwards of 30k wouldn't be a good way to start. Also, what happens when the battery dies? How much does the replacement cost?  About 12k. So on top of spending more than 30k on the car you'd also have to spend an additional 12k down the road for a new battery. 

On the other hand the car I currently drive cost me 4k. Maybe some people can afford to shell out the money for an electric car so that they feel better about themselves. But a regular guy like me isn't going to be able to afford it anytime soon.

Also, these cars would be even more expensive if the government didn't offer a tax credit for them. 

Just remember that people have been calling electric cars the wave of the future for at least a century. 

Eric Sieker's picture

I think this is a good idea. Building a charging station to charge the battery of electric cars is really helpful. Now you can charge your batteries anywhere and you don't have to worry about your batteries & battery chargers if you left them at home.

's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.