In 1984, Coca Cola and Pepsi both announced that it was too expensive to continue using cane sugar to produce their soft drinks and that they would be switching to high fructose corn syrup as a cheaper alternative.
This was in response to the U.S. Customs Service's ban on the importation of sugar from foreign countries in an attempt to artificially inflate the price of domestically produced cane sugar.
The sugar import tariffs and bans, as well as government subsidies for cane sugar farmers and sugar production caps, were started in the early 1800s after the Louisiana Purchase in an attempt to placate sugar farmers. These measures have been continued in one form or another ever since.
Sugar does not grow particularly well in the U.S. Even in the southern states it struggles to flourish. It does, however, grow like a weed in the Caribbean and the Philippines and many foreign farmers relied on their sales to U.S. companies (despite the high import tariffs) for their income.
In order to placate the foreign sugar farmers that suffered as a result of the import bans, then-President Reagan sent aid in the form of wheat, rice, and other grains to the countries affected.
This drove down prices for those grains and made it impossible for sugar farmers to switch to other crops to make money; the move drove may of them out of business. It also cost U.S. taxpayers $200 million a year to fund the foreign aid program.
So what did we accomplish be driving up the price of sugar and destroying farmers in third world countries?
We made America fat and we killed the sugar industry. According to the Center for Disease Control, the percentage of obese Americans has doubled since the 1980s and current studies place a large portion of the blame on the prevalence of high fructose corn syrup.
Because of the ridiculously high prices of sugar in the U.S., many manufacturers began smuggling sugar into the country illegally in the mid 1980s. The U.S. Justice Department launched “Operation Bittersweet” to combat the flow of illegal sugar into the U.S. and prosecuted 30 American companies for violations of the import laws. As a result, most companies switched to high fructose corn syrup (we also subsidize corn farmers with taxpayer money) and many sugar farmers went out of business.
Why can't we seem to learn that government interference in markets, no matter how noble their intentions, is ultimately harmful? When will we stop shooting ourselves in the foot both economically and in our foreign policy with these harebrained schemes?
This isn't the first time we've done this; we made this exact same mistake with cotton farmers by banning the growing of hemp and restricting cheap cotton imports from Africa -- and then sending millions of dollars in aid to local warlords in a feeble attempt to help African farmers.
We can only hope that, someday, people will wake up and realize that we can't keep on going like this. Because it literally might kill us.
- Blog Policy
- Login or register to post comments












You made a compelling case for the fuck up of Reagan, but not for your underlying principles. Just because Reagan's plan didn't work doesn't mean we don't need regulation in other areas. Like say, the derivative market.
I believe you. I would like to see the names of the individuals in the government (in the justice department) who prosecuted them.
It is the responsibility of EVERY individual citizen to thwart all efforts of their government to enforce laws that do more harm than good. Granted, most people are not aware as they should be that so many laws do more harm than good. So really, there are two most important elements to the education we must provide to others: 1) Jury nullification - that is the duty of jurors to judge not only the defendant by the law, but also to judge the law by their own morals.
The jury system works because it places justice into the hands of private citizens and relies on the fact that the majority of humans, under the pressure of import and significance, are good and wise. Check out the Fully Informed Jury Association.
Of course, letting the court know that you understand your duty to judge the law as well as the defendant will usually get you kicked off a jury, but that's a topic for a whole blog post.