Zuccotti Park, the epicenter of the Occupy Wall St. movement, was given notices of eviction on November 15th at one in the morning. Yes, one in the morning.
While the reasoning by NYPD to hand out these orders at such a peculiar hour is not definitively known, there are two distinct possibilities: to catch the OWS camp off guard so as to prevent the chaos that was seen during the Oakland eviction (it must be added that both protesters and police alike acted unsavorily), or because Zucotti Park, the eviction notice read, posed "an increasing health and fire safety hazard to those camped in the park, the city's first responders, and to the surrounding community."
Everyone's heard of the Defecating Man in Seattle. Or the Tuberculosis outbreak in Atlanta. Or the handful of drug overdoses from camps around the country. Or Zuccotti Lung in New York.
Of course, these things are a blemish on a legitimate political movement. They give those who are critical of the OWS movement, myself included, just another reason to call them directionless, smelly, flea-infested vagabonds.
But so what?
None of these protesters were being forced to stay in Zuccotti Park. They were free to come and go as they pleased. The now famous park was neither like the slums of India nor like a 5 star, LEED certified hotel. Risks were very much understood by all.
That's why so many of them chose to eat at the central kitchen that they knew and trusted, not from some sketchy figure offering Zuccotti Joe's. That's why so many of them (except our beloved Defecating Man) did their business in a McDonald's that has been dubbed their official latrine. That's why the smokers of the crowd know who to buy their hand rolled cigarettes from.
Was it a perfect system? Of course not. But could their ever be such a thing in an urban park in one of the largest cities in the world? Doubtful.
There is a very cruel irony in all of this. Despite the complete non-threat to New Yorkers, safety, health, and environmental regulations were used to oust the protesters from their Motherland. Perhaps some of the older and more experienced of the Occupiers were among those that helped put "safeguards" into law.
As diverse are the views of Occupy Wall St. are, it's very clear that regulation is a common theme. Whether it be the banks, the environment, the food supply, education or how businesses hire, everything must be regulated.
Karl Marx famously said, "The last capitalist we shall hang shall be the one who sold us the rope."
Will the occupiers regulate themselves out of existence? Only time will tell.
- Blog Policy
- Login or register to post comments












I enjoyed this post. Though in some ways I'm sympathetic to the OWS movement (their opposition to corporatism, war, and bailouts), your point about the irony of their relationship with regulations is excellent.
Nobody really knows what they want to be. They claim to be anti-free market and pro-interventionist government, yet Students for a Stateless Society is there as well. I'm dissapointed with Occupy, they started out like a libertarian's dream come true, people actually discussing demolition of regulations and socialistic collusion between DC and Wall Street....yet they proved they're in favor of BIGGER government, which makes no sense given what they dislike is what happens when government gets to be too big.
Rejected single-payer health care, increased the round-up and deportation of undocumented immigrants, bailed out the banks while letting the foreclosures continue and unemployment soar, and allowed the increase of police power and the loss of civil rights to continue. irs back taxes