Welcome to the new Young Americans for Liberty! Learn about the new features or give us your feedback!

I THINK You Were Speeding

Jeremy Davis
Jun 11, 2010 at 8:35 AM

In a 5-1 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court recently ruled that the only thing a police officer needs to write you a speeding ticket is his eyes. The court explained that a police officers "unaided visual estimation" was sufficient enough to be used as evidence to convict an individual of violating speed limit laws.

No longer is a radar device necessary to issue a speeding ticket in Ohio, so long as the issuing police officer has undergone some kind of specific training on speed guestimation. Relying solely on an officer’s word will make contesting the accusation a hopeless effort because when it’s a game of our word against theirs, their word far too often trumps our own.

If we know anything about those with power over others is that when granted expanses on that power, they will abuse it. The Ohio courts have essentially granted the police the authority to pull us over for anything. Although it’s blatantly obvious that this ruling in favor of broader police powers isn’t so much one to curb fast drivers, but instead one in which to generate greater revenues through an influx of speeding tickets.

All Ohioans are now basically fair game to be pulled over whether they tend to speed or not based on an officer’s pure suspicion that you were speeding. Ohio lawmakers have achieved a new level of naiveté if they cannot foresee the potential for abuse brought about through this decision.

"Son, do you know how fast you were going?"

"Why no sir, I don’t."

"Well don’t worry; I’m sure it was fast."

You can read more about the Ohio Supreme Courts decision here.

I attended the city council meeting in my village last night and the entire council was outwardly excited about the prospect of adding revenue through this recent decision.  They felt speeding tickets could help cull the growing budget deficit.   One council member was gleeful in the Police Chief’s “ability” to visually come within 3 mph of radar readings, as demonstrated in the Chief’s respective testing.  They all agreed that issuing more tickets under the pretext of the recent Ohio court decision would be a great opportunity to add revenue to the coffers.  One council member added that it was for our safety after she saw me outwardly laughing and shaking my head at their gulag mentality. 

 

Victimless crimes are just that, without a victim.  While I don’t advocate driving 50 mph in a school zone, I don’t advocate these statute enforcers extorting money out of the public merely to close budget gaps created by their own over-spending and inability to be good stewards of the citizen’s extorted funds. 

 

I guess that is why I handle all police stops the following way – www.youtube.com/watch?v=443LDl7sy9s

Since the video of this incident, I have further refined my nature and cause argument to put the police back on their heels during their stops.

's picture

Yes I think I was speeding but the thing is that I don't care that much about speeding as I have upgraded my breaks system and I don't have problems to stop if something unpexpected comes up. 

I also recomend Vocabulary Workshop Answers if you are tired of learning useless things

's picture