The Ground Zero Mosque and Democracy

Creighton Harrington's picture
By Creighton Harrington at 7:30AM

Democracy: When 51% can take the rights of the other 49. 

This mosque fiasco is a perfect example of the tyranny of the majority.  I don't even believe that this majority believes they are being benevolent -- how could they?  There is no way people can be so animalistic and strightforward with hate and at the same time think they are fighting for justice (did anyone else see the older lady in the red screaming during a townhall-like meeting?).

At first, I was hesitant to support the building, but no more.  This thing needs to be built; it is no longer about Islamic public relations (which is what I thought the intial intention was), but a fight for the very liberties Americans claim to hold dear.  Islamic and sexual-orientation freedom are, in my view, the civil rights movement of our generation.

I was hoping the American people were moving towards a stance of principle, even it was only a principle of limited government for convenience.  However, it seems the convenience is without question the defining feature of this new opposition to government, which turns out to only oppose the government doing personally unpleasant things.  Apparently Muslims aren't deserving of religious freedom, property rights, or free speech:  "How dare they buy something and then use it how they want!  How dare they try and promote religious freedom!  This is America, and these colors don't run!"

Once again we must use the Bill of Rights to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.  Gotta love democracy.

One step forward, two steps back.

"Emotions shall rule the day." The plight of democracy. =)

I'm glad to see you came around with your line of thought, Creighton. The practice of all liberties, in addition to being vigorously defended, must be prudently encouraged, even for those whom we do not agree, lest we see the day our liberties begin disappearing.

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. THEN THEY CAME for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. THEN THEY CAME for me and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Martin Niemöller
 

's picture

A Fox poll found that 64% of people think it would be wrong to build a mosque by ground zero, HOWEVER, 61% of people believe they have a right to build it. Even 57% of republicans recognize the right as legitimate (according to this article)

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/poll-64-think-ground-zero-mosque-is-wrong-61-think-they-have-a-right-to-build-it/

's picture

Be careful what credit you give to those 57%...

"Many fellow conservatives say they understand the property rights and 1st Amendment issues and don’t want a legal ban on building the mosque. They just want everybody to be “sensitive” and force, through public pressure, cancellation of the mosque construction.

This sentiment seems to confirm that Islam itself is to be made the issue, and radical religious Islamic views were the only reasons for 9/11. If it became known that 9/11 resulted in part from a desire to retaliate against what many Muslims saw as American aggression and occupation, the need to demonize Islam would be difficult if not impossible."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul690.html

's picture

Is public pressure really force? So pressuring a politician to vote a certain way on an issue is forcing him to vote that way on the issue? Don't we have a right to question the actions of our fellow citizens? All I see is people asking questions. I don't see any force involved (except potentially by the illogical minority who think that the government should ban its creation).

's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.