Can we abolish government schools already?

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 8:11AM

This is a scanned image of a rewritten version of the Bill of Rights which is used in Texas at a government-run middle school.  Hat tip to Matthew Hurtt.

image

A middle-school? Wow, you can always depend on gummint schools to dumb it down. Didn't know they'd blatantly try to rewrite the Bill of Rights though. And in Texas of all places...

's picture

Give our children's minds to feckless bureaucrats and you should not be surprised the things that you see. Re-writing a 2 century old document to make it more readable for educational purposes is laudable (so long as you do an excellent job of preserving original intent). Some of the mistakes made are not surprisingly very friendly to unchecked bureaucratic power. If the supreme court by its very rulings, shows willful ignorance of The Constitution, then can we expect less corruption from a petty official, weaned as they are on books which have their origins in the original "progressive era" educational texts. This tendency to leave important parts of our education to bureaucrats, is the most dangerous habit we as Americans have undertaken in the last 100 years.

's picture

Love to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks.   amazon promotional code

's picture

#2 is almost a good re-written translation. Wait... no... not even close.

's picture

Lol #3 is my favorite.

's picture

According to #5 I don't have to say anything that might make me "see" guilty.  Great!  You'd like to think if they're going to the effort of tampling our Bill of Rights, they could at least go the extra mile and proofread the darn thing.  Congratulations, government, you have lived down to my expectations again.

David Hoyt's picture

This can't be real. There's no way.

Jeff Frazee's picture

I feel the same way. I hope it isn't. It's so wrong it's laughable.

's picture

I don't like it. It's wrong on several points.

Here's a new version:

1) Individuals can worship, speak, broadcast, write and get together any way they want. The government can't tell us how to do any of these things. We can sue the government and tell it how we want things to change.

2) Individuals have the right to own and carry guns, swords and other weapons to protect themselves. They also have the right to form groups to protect themselves against the government and foreign threats, but the government has some power to oversee such groups.

3) It is the government's responsibility to take care of military and law enforcement personnel, and these officials may make no demands on law-abiding individuals.

4) The government will not search any person's home, car, property, person, bank statements, other papers, electronic records or any result of individual efforts without first getting permission from a judge, by providing the judge with a reason to suspect the person is guilty of a crime and the exact places or items to be searched.

5) Any individual not actively serving in the military cannot be accused and convicted of a crime, unless there is enough evidence to convict them and a jury agrees. Once found innocent of a specific unlawful action, an individual cannot be accused of the same action again. The government can't make an individual talk if he or she doesn't want to. The government must give an individual every opportunity to defend himself. The government cannot take private property from someone unless it pays a market rate for it and proves there is a public use for it.

6) Every individual accused of a crime has the right to a public trial by jury as soon as possible in the same area where the crime was committed. The government must tell the individual about the crime he or she is accused of, give the individual a chance to hear the witnesses of the crime tell their story, give the individual a chance to call his or her own witnesses, and pay for a lawyer for the individual if he or she can't afford it.

7) People can sue each other for money, and when the argument involves a claim to more than $20, the individuals may have a jury in a court decide who is right.

8) No individual's punishment can be cruel, unusual or unreasonable.

9) Individuals have other natural rights that are not listed in the constitution.

10) The constitution explains specifically what powers the federal government has. Any powers not given to the federal government in the constitution belong to the separate states or to the people.

's picture

While not quite as bad, even WhiteHouse.GOV has it wrong, claming the Rights protected by the Bill of Rights only apply to citizens, and claiming the 2nd Amendment GIVES the right to keep and bear arms...

http://www.whitehouse.gov/our-government/the-constitution#bill

's picture

WOW.

Jeff Frazee's picture

This may be the worst thing I have ever seen.

's picture

I found a possible source, someone submitted a Lesson Plan to Teacherlinx.com a couple of months ago.

The site requires login, but you can view the Cached view from Google:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22we+can+get+permission+to+own+weapons+to+protect+ourselves%22+Teacherlinx&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

Found this link in the Cached view to the original document:
http://www.teacherlinx.com/attachments/p848_Copy_(2)_of_The_Bill_of_Rights_Rap.doc

's picture

Excellent detective work. Well done.

's picture

the right to ask for permission to own a gun makes me laugh.  

's picture

"The police...usually need permission to search our homes."

I'm sufficiently disturbed. We the People, anyone?

Mikayla Hall's picture

well, while we're rewriting the bill of rights, here is mine:

 

article i. if you try to take our guns, we will kill you.

article ii. go get a real job.

's picture

Say, now there's a usable summary, jon.

's picture

Good grief!!  First let me say that I do not support what our current administration is doing.  I am Not a nmember of the Democratic Party and I do NOT believe in big government.  I am a staunch supporter of The Constitution of The United States of America and think that 99% of our legislatures need to be tossed out on their behinds.

That having been said... what the heck kind of article is this.  Are we not bombarded with enough lies every day from Bureacrats and media.  This article is so very misleading and so so wrong.  It is a part of many government class curriculums to set up mock goverments, interpret or reinterpret the Bill of Rights, other laws and issues, etc...  Just as there are mock trials to learn about our Judicial system.

Both of my children went through this exact same exercise in two different schools in two different states.  I receive Campaign for Liberty articles on my facebook page because I believe in it's mission but this is just wrong.  It is incomplete, unfair, misleading, and inaccurate. 

It is so very true that we must read and listen to EVERYthing with scrutiny, regardless of the source.

's picture

If you're not questioning the authenticity of the document -- which seems to be reasonably well established by its presence in an online lesson planning forum (as well as your own comment, though maybe you did not mean this exact piece) -- then I'm confused about the source of your objections.

This is not, as I understand it, a mock government for a civics class.  Like many, I've done plenty of exercises in mock governments for such courses.  This is a rewriting of the Bill of Rights in such a way as to distort its meaning.  It is not simply a helpful summary; in many instances it changes the basic intention of the original text (Indeed, why would one need a summary?  It's so short already.  Fourth grade classes sometimes memorize the Gettysburg address.  Why would a sixth grade class need a summary to understand the Bill of Rights?).

I sincerely appreciate your interest, and your exhortation to scrutinize sources.  But I fail to see where this is "incomplete, unfair, misleading, and inaccurate."  Have you a source to the contrary, or an explanation of why -- to take only one, easy shot at this document -- a right to bear arms would need to become an opportunity to "get permission to own weapons"?  These are entirely different concepts.  If anything is "incomplete, unfair, misleading, and inaccurate," it is this rewriting of the Bill of Rights.

With that said, I welcome any evidence you can provide to the contrary.  Show me that this is a fraud or that it somehow, somewhere could be a valuable part of a lesson plan.  I would be more than happy to hear that public schools have not sunk this low.

Bonnie Kristian's picture

And just one more thing for Ms. Kristian who uses the term "government-run" middle school.  All public schools receive government funding, as do some private schools, but there is NO "government-run" school... at least not yet.

's picture

If public schools are not run by the government (county government, usually, with additional state and federal funding), then by whom are they run?  Because even Wikipedia's with me on this one.

Bonnie Kristian's picture

I think this is something written by one of the kids; not something used by the school.  Look at Amendment 5.  "see guilty", instead of "seem guilty".  That doesn't look like something a teacher prepared. 

 

's picture

If you look a couple comments up, one of our readers found it on a teachers' planning site.

Bonnie Kristian's picture

Government schools are largely run by the Federal and state Departments of Education. (e.g. the NY department of education says on its website it operates the public schools in New York City) Schoolboards also come into play, but some sort of governments runs these monstrosities at almost all levels.

This doesn't mean every public school is bad, there are good ones. (at the collegiate level, I think UCSF has an oustanding medical program, and George Mason one of the best economics programs) As a whole, however, every objective measure shows these institutions failing miserably and instilling (regimenting) false, pro-state attitudes in its attendees. Private (which is still far too close to the state, but more independent) and homeschooled kids trounce their government-educated competitors in test scores for a reason.

While Bonnie is my fellow blogger and friend, I'd be open to a substantive attack on this post, should you be able to make it. (and on any post on any site) But so far your case appears to be semantic and inaccurate.

Matt Cockerill's picture

Has anyone ever seen Jay Lenos "jaywalking" episodes? Most of the people he queries in these segments have no idea who George Washington is, never mind any other d___  thing about our country or it's government. It seems to me that if a subject is any deeper than the current gossip, hairstyles, or make-up, it does not qualify as worthy to discuss. I have 3 children, and at different occasions have all told me that everything "bad" they ever learned was learned in public school. Two of my kids, I allowed to get the GED certificates because they weren't learning anything in public school anyway. They went to college to get the document that allows for a decent job, one that they could have done without the document in the first place...don't get me started!! This has been going on since I was a student. I had the audacity to go to the library and search out the true history of the American Indians, and brought up in class that the "history" books they were using to "teach" us were totally incorrect. I was punished for this activity by being sent to the, wait for it...... library for the remaining time left in that class. Go figure.

's picture

Orygunner, Did you ever watch the Matrix? Where there is a front door there is a back door.

http://nomedia.110mb.com/www.teacherlinx.com_attachments.html

's picture

A middle-school? Wow, you can always depend on gummint schools to dumb it down. Didn't know they'd blatantly try to rewrite the Bill of Rights though. And in Texas of all places... Kartenlegen

's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.