How does the "peace candidate" plan to expand the military?

Matt Cockerill's picture
By Matt Cockerill at 9:50AM

The New Boss sure looks a lot like the Old Boss so far. In fact, President Obama has sought and won congressional approval for his plan expand the US army by up to 30,000 personnel. The Senate vote was 93-1, with Russ Feingold (who played a similar role on the Patriot Act) heroically voting nay.

But despite the measure's overwhelming congressional support, one has to wonder how the Pentagon plans to recruit so many youngin's to fill Obama's quota. While it is unlikely that the American people would put up with an actual military draft, I've heard some speculate that expanding the military would be a central aim of the proposed, mandatory "national service" program, should it come to pass.

Imagine yourself a young, idealistic statist. You must serve the state, says the law, but it's up to you to decide how to do it. Wouldn't laying your life on the line for The Chosen One be the highest possible honor? Between the romantic adventure the state tells us that war is, and making Sloppy Joes in some deteriorating VA cafeteria, what do you think most young people will choose?

I think we all know the answer to that question, which is yet another reason for us to vocally  and unequivocally oppose such a scheme.

 

Isn't it a bit rich criticizing military spending while getting funding from the Neocons at the American Enterprise Institute?

http://www.yaliberty.org/Strategic-Partners

's picture

Funding? As the person who sees all money coming into YAL, I have not seen that check. It's a big leap to assume our "Strategic Partners" fund us, and it's an even bigger leap to assume our principles can be bought. Quite frankly Curlz31, I find your comment insulting.

Jeff Frazee's picture

If "Strategic Partnership" doesn't mean you get funding, then WHAT EXACTLY DOES IT MEAN ? What is the exact relationship that YAL has with the American Enterprise Institute? Who initiated the contact between the two organisations? Why are you partnering with Bill Kristol, who has called Ron Paul a racist, anti-semite and isolationist?

Why on earth would you be engaged in a "Strategic Partnership" with an organisation that does not support free-market economics or reduced military spending?

's picture

I agree with Jeff. The Mises Institute is also a YAL partner, and do you honestly think that they'd be endorsing a pro-war agenda?

 If YAL starts defending the warfare state or socialized medicine, then you can start to worry. Until that never-coming day, don't attack the people that are actually working for this cause.

Matt Cockerill's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.