Stand for Liberty

Get active and organize on your campus. Learn how to launch a YAL chapter today!

Start a Chapter

Support Our Vision

Your generous support helps us build our campus network to reach tens of thousands of students.

Contribute

Don Rasmussen's picture
By Don Rasmussen at 7:51PM

Honduras: What to Make of World Reaction

"We love our democracy, but we do not like Zelaya"

"We love our democracy, but we do not like Zelaya"

When news of the events in Honduras broke on Sunday morning, the response from the international media was immediate and piqued.  "Coup in Honduras" flashed across millions of TV screens around the world.  As hundreds of newsroom directors rushed to find Honduras on a map, the sense from the media was indignation and shock.  References to the "bad, old days" of Central America abounded, recalling vicious and often bloody military take-overs.

Enter into this environment the deposed man himself, Mel Zelaya, speaking from a conference room inside the airport in Costa Rica; a visibly irritated Costa Rican president Oscar Arias by his side. Zelaya proceeded to spin a harrowing tale of a military siege and being roused from his bed, forced to hide to avoid the flying bullets, and finally being beaten and hustled off to a plane bound and unaware whether he would live or die.  The media carried the news conference live and picked up Zelaya’s story as gospel feeding the emerging narrative of a return to those bad, old days.

Through it all, the government said little and had no prepared media response.  Zelaya’s claims went unchallenged and the government has spent the last week digging out of the public relations nightmare.  The reaction of world leaders was therefore little surprising.

Therefore, I am not so quick to put President Obama firmly in the camp of Hugo Chavez.  I think the administration's response says more about their relative inexperience and emotion-driven way of approaching issues than anything else.  The State Department and a number of key staffers have stepped back and used more neutral language in the last couple of days, but the White House now finds itself in the awkward position of having already called for Zelaya to be restored.  However, we are hearing more talk of “a legal, transparent process” and calls for “the rule of law” rather than the shrill tenor of Sunday and Monday.

The more disturbing pattern is the failure of Obama to get on the right side of any of these foreign issues, from Iran to Honduras he has failed to pick the side of liberty, insomuch that he should be interfering at all.  As I observed on my Facebook page, Obama seems to be turning in to Jimmy Carter faster than Jimmy Carted did.

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 7:49PM

END THE....Bank of England?

The United States isn't the only country with a central bank specializing in destroying the economy which needs to be put to an end.  As Jamie Whyte over at the Times writes in his latest column, our friends over in the United Kingdom seem to be having a similar problem:

Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, complained recently that he lacked the powers required to fulfil his new statutory role of ensuring stability in the banking system. A more powerful Bank of England would do a better job.

He is wrong. The economy would benefit from a weaker Bank of England, stripped of its principal power: namely, the power to set interest rates.

...When interest rates are set by a central bank, demand for borrowing can increase without interest rates increasing and hence without the price signal that would cause people to save more. When dictated, interest rates stop playing their market role of optimally allocating resources between current consumption and investment that will deliver future consumption.

Sound familiar?  Read the rest here.

Posted in:
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 12:46PM

Judge Proposes Outlawing Linking...

...yes, linking.  Linking like this.  Richard Posner, who is apparently a well-known "conservative" judge, has suggested on his blog that linking to copyrighted materials online should be made illegal when the copyright holder has not given explicit consent.  The point of this, it seems, would be to protect the dying newspaper industry by keeping people from reading newspaper articles online for free.  That this would actually be effective in practice is highly unlikely, as Lew Rockwell points out:

So what would happen if Posner got his way (impossible, I guess, given all the great hackers, etc.)? We’d all link to foreign sites only, which would then cover US goings-on even more fully, because they would want the traffic. The Washington Post, the New York Times, and all the rest of the CIA’s house organs would continue to decline until they are bailed out by some Obama stimulus, thus making clear what has long been the case, that they serve the state.

That his proposal might eventually be successful is perhaps a little more likely:

Congress has been known to act with great alacrity on copyright matters when they affect corporate interests. And newspaper owners have been remarkably successful in calling attention to their plight.

But though tax breaks, special non-profit status and other federal goodies will likely go nowhere, a law aimed squarely at the linking practices of sites such as Google News and the Huffington Post would probably prove popular, the facts be damned.

It's ominous that those would push for such a law now have an ally as brilliant and influential as Posner.

Read more here.

Jared Fuller's picture
By Jared Fuller at 12:02PM

Celebrate American r3VOLution!

This July 4th I will be speaking as an activist and member of YAL in Santa Fe, New Mexico at an event entitled Celebrate American r3VOLution.  The event is being hosted by Adam Kokesh who,  so a little blue bird told me, is making a big announcement at the July 4th event concerning his possible run for Congress in New Mexico's 3rd District. We will be sure to cover this announcement here, on YAL.

Also making appearances at the event is the liberty rider himself, Michael Maresco, pioneer of the r3VOLution logo itself, Ernest Hancock, and many other liberty activists from all over the United States; there has even been reports of some finger-painting in the district.  

We're looking forward to a great event here in Santa Fe and I, like you, know that Independence Day is about much more than fireworks and hotdogs.  I know that fellow YAL members will be celebrating American r3VOLution the right way -- about liberty.

What are you doing for liberty on this July 4th?

Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 12:02PM

The government looking out for you

Just when I was about to go shoot fireworks into my eyes this 4th of July, the Federal Government is, as usual, here to save me.  Thanks to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, I now know that flammable objects can, in fact, be dangerous.  Here's some great information from Inez Tenenbaum, the head of the commission:

"We know that 70 percent of all [fireworks-related] accidents occur between June 20 and July 20."

"This is the time of year that people are using fireworks."

"Never pick up a firework that is a dud [and] hasn't fired, because it might go off in your hand."

And here's the kicker:

"Parents need to exercise caution and make certain they're buying fireworks that comply with their state and local and county ordinances."

Yes, she gets paid for this with our tax dollars.  Happy Independence weekend everyone.  And the next time you think about engaging in any marginally dangerous activity, just remember - there's a governmental department for that.

Robert Bentley's picture
By Robert Bentley at 8:36AM

Senate Bill Fines People More Than $1,000 for Refusing Health Care Coverage

What is freedom? Is it just something we made up, or is it a God-given right?  In the U.S. Senate, at least, it seems more attention is being given to expansion of government power than protection of freedom. 

From Fox News:

Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate Democrats looking to fulfill President Obama's top domestic priority.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated the fines will raise around $36 billion over 10 years. Senate aides said the penalties would be modeled on the approach taken by Massachusetts, which now imposes a fine of about $1,000 a year on individuals who refuse to get coverage. Under the federal legislation, families would pay higher penalties than individuals.

This seems like it would have to be a joke, but the reality is starting to sink in...we are moving constantly away from true liberty, and towards ever more tyrannical rule. This story is insane!

How can a government step in and force you to have health insurance? What kind of country is this?  This is frightening; something needs to be done now.

R3VOLUTION!

Posted in:
Elliot Engstrom's picture
By Elliot Engstrom at 8:35AM

Audit the Fed = Audit the STATE

Ron Paul's HR 1207 bill to audit the Federal Reserve has quickly been gaining momentum and support in the House of Representatives and around the country over the past several months.  While it is true that the bill aims to force the Federal Reserve to fess up to all of its dirty dealings, the bill's ramifications could be much more far reaching.  Back in early June, CNBC reported that according to some experts, if the Fed were to be audited, it would be unable to stay alive. 

The Federal Reserve's balance sheet is so out of whack that the central bank would be shut down if subjected to a conventional audit, Jim Grant, editor of Grant's Interest Rate Observer, told CNBC.

With $45 billion in capital and $2.1 trillion in assets, the central bank would not withstand the scrutiny normally afforded other institutions, Grant said in a live interview.

While this is great news for any lover of liberty, the ramifications of this bill could be even more powerful than closing the Fed.  According to George Smith of the Mises Institute, forcing the Fed to show the world its dark side would necessarily force the American government to do the same.

...the really appetizing part of auditing the Fed is knowing what stands behind it. The Fed is a racket at heart, a con game writ large — what else can you call an organization with the exclusive privilege of printing money in the trillions and handing it over to friends? But if this is true, what does that say about the state, the organization that created and sanctions it? Is the Fed an honest mistake in the state's otherwise undying efforts to preserve our liberty, or might it be a key component of a bigger racket?

Now, let's not get our hopes too hight.  As always, we need to keep our focus on the battle at hand -- merely getting the House of Representatives to debate the measure and to comparable support for the bill's Senate compantion, S. 604.   But hey, just because it's only the 4th of July doesn't mean we can't already be dreaming of Christmas.

Jeremy Hodes's picture
By Jeremy Hodes at 8:32AM

Obama to be Given Power to Shut Down the Internet?

If this legislation doesn't scare you I don't know what will.

A legislation proposed on April 1 is no joke. The proposed bill would grant President Obama the authority to shut down public and private networks -- including the restriction of internet traffic -- as part of a cybersecurity emergency plan.

Read the entire article here.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 10:32PM

Hussein Claimed WMDs to Intimidate Iran

The Washington Post reports on Saddam Hussein's revelation shortly before his execution that he intimated that he possessed weapons of mass destruction as a show of bravado against possible attack from Iran.  Moreover, Hussein made clear his distaste for Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda terrorist organization, referring to bin Laden as a "zealot."  This, despite the pretexts we were offered for invasion of Iraq:

Former president George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq six years ago on the grounds that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and posed a threat to international security. Administration officials at the time also strongly suggested Iraq had significant links to al-Qaeda, which carried out the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

Perhaps most interesting, however, is the story's conclusion:

When [the interviewer] noted that there were reasons why Hussein and al-Qaeda should have cooperated -- they had the same enemies in the United States and Saudi Arabia -- Hussein replied that the United States was not Iraq's enemy, and that he simply opposed its policies.

Read more here.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 9:11PM

The Meeting

David Dempster has submitted for your consideration a short story he recently wrote in honor of Independence Day.  I won't ruin the ending for you, so here's a short taste:

"Sir, I have been studying your writings. There are things I do not understand. I wish to engage you in dialog so I may understand better."

Thomas nodded his assent, and the visitor continued: "You have written, 'Most bad government results from too much government.' Surely a strong, powerful government is necessary for maintaining law and order and regulating many aspects of the lives of our citizens."

His host tilted back his head a little and looked down his noble nose at the visitor. "Do you not think a citizen capable of regulating his own life? Who are you or I to say how a man should spend his days, what dreams he should pursue, how he should order his life, pursue his happiness, and enjoy his wealth? Those who colonized this land were pioneers. They came in search of freedom, and it is my intention to keep the land free."

His visitor looked unconvinced.

Read the rest here.