Great ressource, I love your website. About the article, you said :
I should state my opinion from the get-go: NASA is a government entity; therefore, it is inherently inefficient. As a result, the way in which it spends taxpayer dollars is ineffective. I will simply ask: after 51 years and $800b later (in 2007 dollars), what has NASA accomplished?
But science has always a cost, I find it hard to say what could the world have been without such a company as the NASA
Submitted by John B. (not verified) on August 16, 2010.
Great ressource, I love your website. About the article, you said :
I should state my opinion from the get-go: NASA is a government entity; therefore, it is inherently inefficient. As a result, the way in which it spends taxpayer dollars is ineffective. I will simply ask: after 51 years and $800b later (in 2007 dollars), what has NASA accomplished?
But science has always a cost, I find it hard to say what could the world have been without such a company as the NASA