Posts in "Philosophy"

Creighton Harrington's picture
By Creighton Harrington at 6:34AM

Libertarianism or Conservatism

Jack Hunter (the Southern Avenger) hits the nail on the head again and says so much in less than 7 minutes.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 9:58PM

New Op-Ed from Ron Paul: "Restore America by getting government under control"

Ron Paul has a new article out, this time published at the DesMoines Register.  Contrary to what some have claimed about the liberty movement being on the fringe even among young people, Dr. Paul notes the enthusiastic reactions he recieves from college students when advocating limited government:

Rising generations know that America's current course cannot be sustained, and they are ready to change direction. When I speak on college campuses across the country, the topic that consistently gets the loudest applause is stopping our system of endlessly printing money out of thin air by ending the Federal Reserve and returning to sound money.

Agreeing with the president that the "time for change is now," Dr. Paul details what true change would look like -- change which makes a lasting difference, not the farcical variety we've been getting from both parties for years:

True change will object to any unbalanced budget, instead of merely trimming around the edges.


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 2:13PM

Serving the Nation ≠ Serving the State

While discussing my summer plans recently, the subject of a large rally of Vietnam veterans which is scheduled to occur in DC over the Memorial Day weekend rather oddly came up.  I noted that I thought it was a silly event to have, because although many of the individual veterans are undoubtedly people worthy of honor, having fought in this aggressive foreign intervention was hardly worth celebration.  One of the participants in the conversation strongly objected, arguing that whatever my opinion of the war, I should still understand a desire to commemorate these veterans' brave service to their country.

Brave though some of our soldiers may have been, what they engaged in was not service to our country; it was service to the state...and I see no reason to commemorate that.  The state is not the same as the country, and the two's interests rarely converge.

What exactly does this mean?


Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 1:01PM

Liberty Roundup

Six articles I'd recommend for an interesting read:

  1. "Health Savings Accounts Are the Answer."  Acknowledging that there is a problem with the health care system, this post on the Civil Society Trust blog argues that it is not a problem government can fix.  The source of the problem?  "Our present system of medical spending and reimbursement is an unholy 'mashup' of two concepts that need to remain separate:  health care and health insurance."  Read more here.
  2. "Freedom -- the First Casualty," by Tom Eddlem.  Writing for the Antiwar League, Eddlem contends that "Freedom has become the first casualty in war. Freedom is always the first casualty in war."   He goes on to detail our loss of freedom, constitutional amendment by amendment.  Find those details here (and share them with your "constitutionalist" warhawk friends).
  3. "The Paulpocaplypse," by Brian Doherty.  After publishing an inane hit piece on Ron Paul a couple days ago, Reason to some extent redeems itself with this article, which notes:  "Signs like the CPAC vote of a significant number of politically active youngsters believing in Ron Paul are indeed a sign of an apocalypse of sorts for the world that most politicians and pundits know. If Ron Paul is right, then everything they know is wrong."  So true.   More here.

Read more here
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 7:18AM
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 11:31AM

Republican Revisionism

Since George W. exited the White House, many Republicans have slowly but surely attempted to rehabilitate the image of their pathetically unconservative party, writes Howard Rich at NetRightNation.  Having the GOP in power, they argue, wasn't "'all that bad' -- and certainly not as bad as the socialist hordes who have ostensibly pushed America to the brink of financial ruin over the last year." 

Indeed, the GOP has attempted to co-opt the fervor of the tea partiers, despite having engaged in exactly the same big government practices which both groups now loudly decry (I'm presently at CPAC, where Mike Pence just said that "Republicans in Congress are back in the fight and they're back in the fight on the right!"  Yeah, I'll believe that when I see it with a GOP majority.  It's easy to be principled when you're the underdog). 

Sadly, their attempts sometimes seem to succeed as tea party protesters quickly forget that the very GOP now courting them was just a few years ago using control of all three branches of the government to...well, to make the government more invasive and overgrown than ever.  As Rich concludes:

Was Bush a better steward of your tax dollars than Obama?

Yes – but that’s the problem. Getting mugged worse the second time around doesn’t absolve the first thief of his culpability.

And the first thief is very guilty indeed.  Republican revisionism and cozying up to those newly angry with the government is to be expected and will frequently be successful.  But in the liberty movement, at least, let's maintain memories more than two years long.  (Hat tip to Adam Bitely.)

Matt Cockerill's picture
By Matt Cockerill at 4:28PM

The DiLorenzo-Woods Approach

Shortly after his excellent CPAC speech today on "Dishonest Abe's" white supremacy, economic nationalism, and anti-Constitutionalism, one of Tom DiLorenzo's questioners asked, "Isn't there a concern with indoctrination regarding these facts?" DiLo's hilarious response was something along the lines of: "Well if it's true, who cares?"

This brings us to a an important debate. Must we be tepid and measured in our advocacy of liberty?

Hardly. Though Dr. Paul is -- in my view -- liberty's best spokesperson, he's the one of the only speakers I've ever heard that can kick some serious butt while still being mild-mannered. For the rest of us, I feel it's best  to speak the truth as we see it without holding back. Singling out run-of-the-mill statists is wrong-headed, but how can we possibly justify pandering to the bad guys at the top? For those of us serious about the libertarian credo that "taxation is theft, aggressive war is mass murder, and conscription is slavery," how the heck could we possibly hold back?

 So in your advocacy of liberty, try to emulate the no-compromise approach of Dr. Tom Woods and DiLorenzo. This may anger some socialists and warmongers, but the prospect of converting one more person to liberty -- which I believe is much more likely if done directly -- is well worth it.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 7:38AM

Secessionism ≠ Racism

"[S]lander is often used in political debate and is often effective, and it has certainly been effective in preventing any rational discussion about nullification and secession in today’s United States."

Read the full text here.

Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 2:42PM
Posted in:
Bonnie Kristian's picture
By Bonnie Kristian at 10:30AM

House Minority Leader Confuses the Constitution with the Declaration

Oh dear.  House Minority Leader John Boehner has confused the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence -- while holding a Constitution in his hand, no less!

Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the House minority leader, took the podium at a Republican rally, waved a document defiantly and declared:"This is my copy of the Constitution, and I'm going to stand here with the Founding Fathers who wrote in the Preamble, We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed with the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness …" Mr. Boehner was encouraging participants to protest the pending House vote for health care reform by demanding their constitutional right to make medical decisions.

Pop quiz: What's wrong with this picture?

What's wrong is that the quote he cited is neither in a preamble or in the Constitution -- it's in the main text of the Declaration.  Eesh...maybe we could have someone as House Minority Leader who actually knows the text of the Constitution he swore to uphold? (AHEM Ron Paul)

Wait, noooo....that's clearly too much to ask.