October 2011

Anthony V. Ardizzone's picture
By Anthony Ardizzone at 10:53AM

Sustainability and Liberty

SustainabilitySustainability is a necessary component for the Earth. As a contributor to my school's sustainability blog and as a member of my school's student government sustainability committee, I know full well that achieving sustainability is crucial to human well-being.

That being said, many proponents of sustainability are unfortunately trumpetting the wrong sound. Endorsing government stewardship of resources and regulation of individual actions regarding the environment are a fatal blow to the cause of sustainability. There are a number of factors to consider when discussing sustainability. All of them point to a better way to tackle the problem than authoritative coercion.

First off, sustainability can only be achieved when THREE constitutent wholes are met: social, environmental, and economic.


Read more here
Jihan Huq's picture
By Jihan Huq at 10:52AM

Cops of the World

We live in a world where our government has used and abused its influence to topple foreign governments or become the notorious bully everyone fears. Performed by lefist musician Phil Ochs, the song "Cops of the World" passionately articulates that reality. So -- if I may suggest --  allow your ears (and mind)  to take a break from your daily choice of music and listen to this.  

BrianMUGA's picture
By Brian Underwood at 9:46AM

A Brief Overview of Just Law

LawIt never fails that whenever a liberty activists asks the question, "Why should I have to listen to [insert unjust policy here]?" a statist will quickly respond, "Because it's the law!"

We obviously can see that they're missing the point -- simply because something is law does not at all prove that it is right. Unlike social contract theorists who claim that the law is whatever the majority makes of it, all just laws are actually based upon man's rights.

Though merely a summary, this article outlines that which determines the correctness or incorrectness of all laws:

These objective codes of law exist only to prevent unethical actions between men, meaning the employment initiated force from one man or group of men to another. The reason for this is that at any point one man must subject himself to the will or another, his life and all other values which maintain and improve his life (physically and psychologically) are jeopardized. Man’s life is wholly and unequivocally his own to do with as he pleases within the context of respecting others’ ownership of their lives. Claiming otherwise would suggest that, somehow, the correctness of man’s values can be determined by using another man’s life as an ultimate value, allowing his own life to become of secondary importance. This is the philosophy of altruism, of death as an ultimate value, which disregards all real values of man’s own life. (This is not to say that the life of another can possess no real rational value – it may even be of such great value that it is necessary to keep one’s own life worth living – but it cannot, if men are to act morally, be the ultimate value.) All limitations of initiated force as determined by man’s life are known as “rights,” incontrovertible moral absolutes which at no time can be violated. In fact, the phrase “natural rights” is a very appropriate way to describe these absolutes – not because they exist in some sort of mystic, spiritual sense, but because they themselves are based upon the natural laws that govern the whole of reality. Laws may justly only protect these rights, not infringe upon them.

Click here for the full article.

Drew Owens's picture
By Andrew Owens at 9:41AM

Free Speech Board at Auburn University

Following last year's enthusiasm with YAL Auburn's free speech board, the excercise of the 1st Amendment on campus was once again utilized -- albeit in an unorganized fashion.  Though not everyone's priorities included a geo-political focus or Austrian business cycle theory, a recurring theme was present on the board during the day in the form of parking complaints.  Leave it to a public institution, eh?  

Free Speech Board

Students who appreciated the right to voice their opinions and who wanted more tastes of liberty were provided a wide selection of materials to advance their knowledge.  Overall the board received a positive response from both faculty and students and resulted in new sign-ups!

kerr.g's picture
By Greg Kerr at 9:27AM

YAL @ NU Gets Chapter T-Shirts

Our chapter at Northeastern University got chapter t shirts to help increase our name recognition and presence on campus. The logo is our school mascot (a husky) riding an eagle. Check 'em out!

Front

Back

cwaleba's picture
By Colin Albea at 9:00AM

Repeal HB56!

YAL@UAB participates in the protest and discussion surrounding Alabama's controversial new immigration law.

BrianMUGA's picture
By Brian Underwood at 11:30AM

10 Questions with Don Watkins

Don Watkins

As liberty activists, we draw from a great number of pro-liberty sources to create our own individualist philosophies. This exposure to different perspectives strengthens us intellectually and helps shape who we are.

In this interview, Slade Mendenhall questions Don Watkins, an analyst for the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, about several issues, including the Fed, the financial collapse, entitlement programs and much more.

The Federal Reserve, remember, is in charge of the entire banking and monetary system, which was nationalized a century ago. That’s the lifeblood of the economy. Money is the thread that connects the entire economy, and when you mess with it, you can do incredible damage. In my judgment, that’s exactly what happened last decade to cause the financial crisis. The financial crisis is a complex subject, but as I and many others have argued, the first cause was then-Fed chairman Alan Greenspan’s decision in the early 2000s to drive interest rates extremely low–lower than even the rate of inflation. It was those low interest rates that enticed and enabled people to take on huge amounts of debt to buy and invest in homes. You could not have had a housing bubble without the Fed.

Click here for the full interview.

BenLevine16's picture
By Benjamin Levine at 11:07AM

An Alternative to the Public Welfare State

Libertarians and the left find common ground on quite a lot of issues; however, when it comes to helping out the poor (something both sides want to do but disagree on policy) there is a definite split, as those on the left wish to use government programs to help those in need.  The problem is that theWhat welfare through taxation really is government does not have any money of its own; therefore, it has to take it from individuals through taxation.  Additionally, the government is just flat out horrible at fixing things, let alone a massive problem such as poverty.

Libertarians, on the other hand, wish to see a privatization of the welfare state.  This does not mean the government contracting taxpayers' dollars out to private organizations, though; that simply isn't enough change.  It means real privatization:  letting individuals keep their money and decide for themselves how to use it and where to donate it.  This is the way a free society works, rather than by stealing from some people and redistributing it to others.  Of course, liberals say that this isn't possible; there is no way, they argue, that private individuals and organizations can take care of the nation's poor.  But is this necessarily true?


Read more here
Ryan Gilroy's picture
By Ryan Gilroy at 1:29PM

Rock Concert on Campus

If you're looking for a social event to host on campus, consider a concert with Jordan Page:

If you're interested please email him here.

Posted in:
Eric Sharp. ETF's picture
By Eric Sharp at 1:24PM

YAL MTSU Marches against Victim Blaming

October 2nd, the MTSU chapter of YAL attended, tabled at, and was an official ally of the Nashville Slutwalk.

The ... what? Slutwalk is an international movement to fight the blaming of the victims of sexual abuse and violence for the actions taken against them. It was started after a police officer in Canada told a classroom of girls that if they didn't want to get raped then they should not dress like "sluts."  But the fact of the matter is that women and men are abused and raped everyday irrespective of what they are wearing.

Slutwalk is a controversial event, even amongst feminists, but from a libertarian perspective sponsoring the event made perfect sense. Given that we all own our bodies, it would be utterly perverse to blame someone for violation of their right to self-ownership.

stop v blamingThe message of the event was instead of solely teaching people how to avoid getting raped, they ought to be taught not to rape.

Everyone wore what ever they wanted to. Some chose to dress provactively, while others wore ordinary clothes some holding signs saying, "This is what I was wearing when I was raped. Did I deserve it?" [1] [2]

Some higher quality photos of the event were taken by Chris M. Scruggs.


Read more here